BACKGROUND: Abnormal function in reward circuitry in cocaine addiction could predate drug use as a risk factor, follow drug use as a consequence of substance-induced alterations, or both. METHODS: We used a functional magnetic resonance imaging monetary incentive delay task (MIDT) to investigate reward-loss neural response differences among 42 current cocaine users, 35 former cocaine users, and 47 healthy subjects who also completed psychological measures and tasks related to impulsivity and reward. RESULTS: We found various reward processing-related group differences in several MIDT phases. Across task phases we found a control > current user > former user activation pattern, except for loss outcome, where former compared with current cocaine users activated ventral tegmental area more robustly. We also found regional prefrontal activation differences during loss anticipation between cocaine-using groups. Both groups of cocaine users scored higher than control subjects on impulsivity, compulsivity and reward-punishment sensitivity factors. In addition, impulsivity-related factors correlated positively with activation in amygdala and negatively with anterior cingulate activation during loss anticipation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with healthy subjects, both former and current users displayed abnormal brain activation patterns during MIDT performance. Both cocaine groups differed similarly from healthy subjects, but differences between former and current users were localized to the ventral tegmental area during loss outcome and to prefrontal regions during loss anticipation, suggesting that long-term cocaine abstinence does not normalize most reward circuit abnormalities. Elevated impulsivity-related factors that relate to loss processing in current and former users suggest that these tendencies and relationships may pre-exist cocaine addiction.
BACKGROUND: Abnormal function in reward circuitry in cocaine addiction could predate drug use as a risk factor, follow drug use as a consequence of substance-induced alterations, or both. METHODS: We used a functional magnetic resonance imaging monetary incentive delay task (MIDT) to investigate reward-loss neural response differences among 42 current cocaine users, 35 former cocaine users, and 47 healthy subjects who also completed psychological measures and tasks related to impulsivity and reward. RESULTS: We found various reward processing-related group differences in several MIDT phases. Across task phases we found a control > current user > former user activation pattern, except for loss outcome, where former compared with current cocaine users activated ventral tegmental area more robustly. We also found regional prefrontal activation differences during loss anticipation between cocaine-using groups. Both groups of cocaine users scored higher than control subjects on impulsivity, compulsivity and reward-punishment sensitivity factors. In addition, impulsivity-related factors correlated positively with activation in amygdala and negatively with anterior cingulate activation during loss anticipation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with healthy subjects, both former and current users displayed abnormal brain activation patterns during MIDT performance. Both cocaine groups differed similarly from healthy subjects, but differences between former and current users were localized to the ventral tegmental area during loss outcome and to prefrontal regions during loss anticipation, suggesting that long-term cocaine abstinence does not normalize most reward circuit abnormalities. Elevated impulsivity-related factors that relate to loss processing in current and former users suggest that these tendencies and relationships may pre-exist cocaine addiction.
Authors: Nora D Volkow; Gene-Jack Wang; Frank Telang; Joanna S Fowler; Jean Logan; Anna-Rose Childress; Millard Jayne; Yeming Ma; Christopher Wong Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Marc N Potenza; Kwang-ik Adam Hong; Cheryl M Lacadie; Robert K Fulbright; Keri L Tuit; Rajita Sinha Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Elise E DeVito; Patrick D Worhunsky; Kathleen M Carroll; Bruce J Rounsaville; Hedy Kober; Marc N Potenza Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: David A Kareken; Eric D Claus; Merav Sabri; Mario Dzemidzic; Ann E K Kosobud; Alexander J Radnovich; Dwight Hector; Vijay A Ramchandani; Sean J O'Connor; Mark Lowe; Ting-Kai Li Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Patrick D Worhunsky; Alecia D Dager; Shashwath A Meda; Sabin Khadka; Michael C Stevens; Carol S Austad; Sarah A Raskin; Howard Tennen; Rebecca M Wood; Carolyn R Fallahi; Marc N Potenza; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Iris M Balodis; Hedy Kober; Patrick D Worhunsky; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey D Pearlson; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Sarah W Yip; Elise E DeVito; Hedy Kober; Patrick D Worhunsky; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Colm G Connolly; Stephan J Jordan; Gregory G Brown; Martin P Paulus; Susan F Tapert; Robert K Heaton; Steven P Woods; Igor Grant Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Renato Polimanti; Qian Wang; Shashwath A Meda; Krishna T Patel; Godfrey D Pearlson; Hongyu Zhao; Lindsay A Farrer; Henry R Kranzler; Joel Gelernter Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Cleo L Crunelle; Anne Marije Kaag; Hanna E van den Munkhof; Liesbeth Reneman; Judith R Homberg; Bernard Sabbe; Wim van den Brink; Guido van Wingen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 5.038