M Elena Del Baño-Aledo1, Francesc Medina-Mirapeix2, Pilar Escolar-Reina3, Joaquina Montilla-Herrador3, Sean M Collins4. 1. Central Unit of Anatomy, Catholic University San Antonio, Murcia, Spain. 2. Department of Physiotherapy, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: mirapeix@um.es. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, Regional Campus of International Excellence 'Campus Mare Nostrum', University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify elements of the physiotherapist-patient interaction considered by patients when they evaluate the quality of care in outpatient rehabilitation settings. DESIGN: A qualitative study with nine focus groups, Two researchers conducted the focus groups, and a topic guide with predetermined questions was used. Each group discussion was audiotaped,, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically according to a modified grounded theory approach. SETTING: Three postacute ambulatory centers in Barcelona, Madrid and Seville (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven adults undergoing outpatient rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions/injuries. RESULTS: Patients based their evaluations of quality of care on their assessment of physiotherapists' willingness to provide information and education, technical expertise and interpersonal manners (eg. respect, emotional support and sensitivity changes in the patient's status). Both positive and negative aspects of the physiotherapist-patient interaction emerged under all these themes, except for friendly and respectful communication. CONCLUSION: This study identified which elements of the physiotherapist-patient interaction are considered by patients when evaluating the quality of care in rehabilitation outpatient settings. Further research should work to develop self-report questionnaires about patients' experiences of the physiotherapist-patient interaction in rehabilitation services to provide empirical and quantitative evidence.
OBJECTIVE: To identify elements of the physiotherapist-patient interaction considered by patients when they evaluate the quality of care in outpatient rehabilitation settings. DESIGN: A qualitative study with nine focus groups, Two researchers conducted the focus groups, and a topic guide with predetermined questions was used. Each group discussion was audiotaped,, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically according to a modified grounded theory approach. SETTING: Three postacute ambulatory centers in Barcelona, Madrid and Seville (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-seven adults undergoing outpatient rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions/injuries. RESULTS:Patients based their evaluations of quality of care on their assessment of physiotherapists' willingness to provide information and education, technical expertise and interpersonal manners (eg. respect, emotional support and sensitivity changes in the patient's status). Both positive and negative aspects of the physiotherapist-patient interaction emerged under all these themes, except for friendly and respectful communication. CONCLUSION: This study identified which elements of the physiotherapist-patient interaction are considered by patients when evaluating the quality of care in rehabilitation outpatient settings. Further research should work to develop self-report questionnaires about patients' experiences of the physiotherapist-patient interaction in rehabilitation services to provide empirical and quantitative evidence.
Authors: Daniel C Ribeiro; Kate Spiers; Laura Thomas; Kiriffi Leilua; Matthew Wilkes; Shontal Norton; Sarah E Lamb Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: O Rodríguez Nogueira; J Botella-Rico; M C Martínez González; M Leal Clavel; J Morera-Balaguer; A R Moreno-Poyato Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira; Jaume Morera Balaguer; Abel Nogueira López; Juan Roldán Merino; José-Martín Botella-Rico; Sonia Del Río-Medina; Antonio R Moreno Poyato Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240