Literature DB >> 23777587

Defining recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair: correlating symptoms and radiographic findings.

Anne O Lidor1, Qingwen Kawaji, Miloslawa Stem, Richard M Fleming, Michael A Schweitzer, Kimberley E Steele, Michael R Marohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has been shown to result in excellent relief of symptoms and improved quality of life (QOL) despite a high radiographically identified recurrence rate. Because there is no uniform definition of PEH recurrence, it is difficult to compare studies reporting on this. This study attempts to introduce consistency to the definition of PEH recurrence based on correlation of symptoms and radiographic findings.
METHODS: This is an analysis of data derived from an ongoing prospective study. From April 2009 to December 2012, we enrolled 101 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic PEH repair with bioprosthesis buttressed over a primary cruroplasty. A validated gastroesophageal reflux disease-specific QOL tool was administered to patients before, and at 2 and 12 months postoperatively. Upper gastrointestinal barium contrast examination (UGI) was performed at 1 year.
RESULTS: Of 101 patients, 13 were not available for follow-up, 58 reached the 1-year milestone for interval UGI, and 1 patient required reoperation for symptomatic recurrent PEH. There was no relationship between total QOL score and radiographic recurrent hernia (RRH); however, significant deterioration in many symptoms was seen in RRH > 2 cm. Based on these findings, we defined recurrence as RRH > 2 cm and calculated our recurrence rate as 28% (n = 16).
CONCLUSION: Our analysis of symptom scores after laparoscopic PEH repair suggests that significant worsening occurs with RRH > 2 cm. Given that there is no consistent description of recurrent PEH, we suggest this as a possible standardized definition. Overall, patients with recurrent PEHs continue to experience excellent QOL and rarely require reoperation.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23777587     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  12 in total

1.  Combining laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair with sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Ankit D Patel; Edward Lin; Nathaniel W Lytle; Juan P Toro; Jahnavi Srinivasan; Arvinpal Singh; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic augmentation of the diaphragmatic hiatus with biologic mesh versus suture repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Beat P Müller-Stich; George A Antoniou; Gernot Köhler; Ruzica-Rosalia Luketina; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Contemporary management of paraesophaegeal hernias: establishing a European expert consensus.

Authors:  E M Bonrath; T P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospective study of giant paraesophageal hernia repair with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  John R Stringham; Jennifer V Phillips; Timothy L McMurry; Drew L Lambert; David R Jones; James M Isbell; Christine L Lau; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  The Optimal Approach to Symptomatic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Important Technical Considerations.

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-10

6.  Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Database Analysis.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Bhavani Pokala; Mitchel Misfeldt; Spyridon Pagkratis; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Revisional paraesophageal hernia repair outcomes compare favorably to initial operations.

Authors:  John Wennergren; Salomon Levy; Curtis Bower; Michael Miller; Daniel Borman; Daniel Davenport; Margaret Plymale; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Novel combined VATS/laparoscopic approach for giant and complicated paraesophageal hernia repair: description of technique and early results.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Symptom Relief After Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Without Mesh.

Authors:  Rym El Khoury; Mauricio Ramirez; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Saino; A Sozzi; G Bonitta; G Micheletto; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.