AIMS: Patients with type 2 diabetes have increased arterial stiffness and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease compared with non-diabetics. Arterial stiffness and central waveforms can be assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pulse wave analysis (PWA) using the SphygmoCor device. These methods can potentially improve cardiovascular risk stratification in the future. However, a prerequisite is acceptable reproducibility. The objective of this study was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of PWV and PWA indices in patients with type 2 diabetes using the SphygmoCor device. METHODS: Two trained observers (A and B) each undertook two PWA and two carotid-femoral PWV recordings in random order in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes under standardized conditions on the right side of the patients. Observer A also made double recordings on the left side. The mean of the two recordings was used for inter-observer comparison. Data were analyzed by Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The mean intra-observer differences (± 2SD) on the right side for observer A and B, respectively, were 0.0 ± 2.8 mmHg and 0.3 ± 3.2 mmHg (aortic systolic blood pressue (BP)), 0.0 ± 1.2 mmHg and 0.1 ± 1.0 mmHg (aortic diastolic BP), - 1.1 ± 3.2% and 1.1 ± 9.6% (central augmentation index (Aix)), - 1.6 ± 6.6% and 0.1 ± 9.0% (Aix normalized to heart rate 75 beats/min (Aix@HR75)) and 0.1 ± 1.8 m/s and 0.0 ± 1.6 m/s (PWV). The mean inter-observer differences (± 2SD) were - 2.6 ± 13.0 mmHg (aortic systolic BP), - 2.1 ± 7.4 mmHg (aortic diastolic BP), - 0.8 ± 8.4% (Aix), - 1.5 ± 7.4% (Aix@HR75) and - 0.3 ± 1.6 m/s (PWV). Left-vs-right comparison showed comparable results (observer A). CONCLUSIONS: PWA and PWV assessed with the SphygmoCor device are characterized by good reproducibility in patients with type 2 diabetes.
AIMS: Patients with type 2 diabetes have increased arterial stiffness and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease compared with non-diabetics. Arterial stiffness and central waveforms can be assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and pulse wave analysis (PWA) using the SphygmoCor device. These methods can potentially improve cardiovascular risk stratification in the future. However, a prerequisite is acceptable reproducibility. The objective of this study was to assess the intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of PWV and PWA indices in patients with type 2 diabetes using the SphygmoCor device. METHODS: Two trained observers (A and B) each undertook two PWA and two carotid-femoral PWV recordings in random order in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes under standardized conditions on the right side of the patients. Observer A also made double recordings on the left side. The mean of the two recordings was used for inter-observer comparison. Data were analyzed by Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: The mean intra-observer differences (± 2SD) on the right side for observer A and B, respectively, were 0.0 ± 2.8 mmHg and 0.3 ± 3.2 mmHg (aortic systolic blood pressue (BP)), 0.0 ± 1.2 mmHg and 0.1 ± 1.0 mmHg (aortic diastolic BP), - 1.1 ± 3.2% and 1.1 ± 9.6% (central augmentation index (Aix)), - 1.6 ± 6.6% and 0.1 ± 9.0% (Aix normalized to heart rate 75 beats/min (Aix@HR75)) and 0.1 ± 1.8 m/s and 0.0 ± 1.6 m/s (PWV). The mean inter-observer differences (± 2SD) were - 2.6 ± 13.0 mmHg (aortic systolic BP), - 2.1 ± 7.4 mmHg (aortic diastolic BP), - 0.8 ± 8.4% (Aix), - 1.5 ± 7.4% (Aix@HR75) and - 0.3 ± 1.6 m/s (PWV). Left-vs-right comparison showed comparable results (observer A). CONCLUSIONS: PWA and PWV assessed with the SphygmoCor device are characterized by good reproducibility in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Authors: Kristian L Funck; Esben Laugesen; Pernille Høyem; Brian Stausbøl-Grøn; Won Y Kim; Leif Østergaard; Dora Grauballe; Troels K Hansen; Christian S Buhl; Per L Poulsen Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.320