| Literature DB >> 23776334 |
Naifu Liu1, Xiugui Sheng, Yi Liu, Xiaoling Zhang, Jinming Yu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CD70 has been regarded as a novel potential therapeutic target for multiple cancers. In this study, we characterized the expression of the CD70 protein in ovarian carcinomas and assessed its clinical-pathological prognostic value.Entities:
Keywords: CD70; chemotherapy resistance; immunohistochemistry; ovarian carcinoma; survival
Year: 2013 PMID: 23776334 PMCID: PMC3681401 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S44445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1Representative images of CD70 immunostaining in ovarian cancer tissues. (A) high CD70 expression; (B) low CD70 expression having <10% of tumor cells with strong staining intensity; (C) low CD70 expression with totally negative staining; (D) negative control (primary antibody was replaced by immunoglobulin G).
Correlation between CD70 expression levels with clinicopathological characteristics in ovarian carcinomas
| Total | CD70 expression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Low | High | |||
| <51 years | 36 | 30 | 6 | 0.883 |
| ≥51 years | 56 | 46 | 10 | |
| G1 | 16 | 12 | 4 | |
| G2 | 32 | 26 | 6 | 0.572 |
| G3 | 44 | 38 | 6 | |
| 3 | 67 | 52 | 15 | 0.060 |
| 4 | 25 | 24 | 1 | |
| Optimal | 45 | 38 | 7 | 0.649 |
| Suboptimal | 47 | 38 | 9 | |
| Resistant | 30 | 19 | 11 | 0.001 |
| Sensitive | 62 | 57 | 5 | |
Abbreviation: FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival curves for overall survival rates of ovarian cancer patients according to CD70 expression.
Note: High CD70 expression subgroup showed a shorter overall survival than the low CD70 expression group (P = 0.012, log-rank test).
Abbreviation: n, number.
Multivariate analysis of overall survival with regard to clinicopathological characteristics and CD70 expression
| Characteristics | Multivariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Hazard ratio (95% CI) | ||
| (<51 years versus ≥ 51 years) | 0.947 (0.498–1.801) | 0.867 |
| (grade 1 versus grade 2 versus grade 3) | 1.155 (0.774–1.723) | 0.480 |
| (3 versus 4) | 1.226 (0.566–2.655) | 0.606 |
| Level of cytoreduction achieved (optimal versus suboptimal) | 0.730 (0.405–1.316) | 0.295 |
| (resistant versus sensitive) | 2.164 (1.023–4.578) | 0.043 |
| (high versus low) | 3.864 (1.703–8.766) | 0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.