BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic, progressive or recurrent Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a dismal outcome. The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination with vincristine for patients with relapsed and refractory ES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with relapsed or refractory ES were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1), irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) /day i.v. days 1-5) and temozolomide (125 mg/m(2) /day p.o. days 1-5) (VIT) during the period 2008-2012. All toxicities were documented. RESULTS: A total of 91 cycles (median 4.1 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in five patients, partial response (PR) in seven patients, stable disease (SD) in three patients, and progression disease (PD) in seven patients, with an overall response rate of 68.1%. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (range 1.1-37.1 months). Five patients (22.7%) are alive with no evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 2.1-46.5); four of them received consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant after responding to VIT. Outcome was better for patients with relapsed ES compared with patients who progressed to initial therapy (estimated 2 year overall survival 36.4% vs. 0%, respectively). There were no significant toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated regimen in refractory ES. This combination deserves further investigation in the upfront management of patients with metastatic disease.
BACKGROUND:Patients with metastatic, progressive or recurrent Ewing sarcoma (ES) have a dismal outcome. The combination of irinotecan and temozolomide has been proposed as an effective salvage regimen for some pediatric malignancies. Thus, we sought to evaluate this combination with vincristine for patients with relapsed and refractory ES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with relapsed or refractory ES were treated with the combination of vincristine (1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1), irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) /day i.v. days 1-5) and temozolomide (125 mg/m(2) /day p.o. days 1-5) (VIT) during the period 2008-2012. All toxicities were documented. RESULTS: A total of 91 cycles (median 4.1 cycles/patient) were administered. A complete response (CR) was achieved in five patients, partial response (PR) in seven patients, stable disease (SD) in three patients, and progression disease (PD) in seven patients, with an overall response rate of 68.1%. Median time to progression was 3.0 months (range 1.1-37.1 months). Five patients (22.7%) are alive with no evidence of disease with a median follow-up of 10.3 months (range 2.1-46.5); four of them received consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant after responding to VIT. Outcome was better for patients with relapsed ES compared with patients who progressed to initial therapy (estimated 2 year overall survival 36.4% vs. 0%, respectively). There were no significant toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The shorter, 5-day VIT regimen is an active and well-tolerated regimen in refractory ES. This combination deserves further investigation in the upfront management of patients with metastatic disease.
Authors: A Raciborska; K Bilska; K Drabko; E Michalak; R Chaber; M Pogorzała; K Połczyńska; G Sobol; M Wieczorek; K Muszyńska-Rosłan; M Rychlowska-Pruszyńska; C Rodriguez-Galindo; M Dziuk Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Michele Dowless; Caitlin D Lowery; Terry Shackleford; Matthew Renschler; Jennifer Stephens; Robert Flack; Wayne Blosser; Simone Gupta; Julie Stewart; Yue Webster; Jack Dempsey; Alle B VanWye; Philip Ebert; Philip Iversen; Jonathan B Olsen; Xueqian Gong; Sean Buchanan; Peter Houghton; Louis Stancato Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Maurizio Ghisoli; Minal Barve; Robert Mennel; Carl Lenarsky; Staci Horvath; Gladice Wallraven; Beena O Pappen; Sam Whiting; Donald Rao; Neil Senzer; John Nemunaitis Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Bhuvana A Setty; Joseph R Stanek; Leo Mascarenhas; Alexandra Miller; Rochelle Bagatell; Fatih Okcu; Lauren Nicholls; David Lysecki; Abha A Gupta Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Michael A Klufas; Suzanne L Wolden; George C Bohle; Leonard H Wexler; David H Abramson Journal: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.746
Authors: Saskia L Gooskens; Norbert Graf; Rhoikos Furtwängler; Filippo Spreafico; Christophe Bergeron; Gema L Ramírez-Villar; Jan Godzinski; Christian Rübe; Geert O Janssens; Gordan M Vujanic; Ivo Leuschner; Aurore Coulomb-L'Hermine; Anne M Smets; Beatriz de Camargo; Sara Stoneham; Harm van Tinteren; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 14.432