Literature DB >> 23775875

Calcineurin inhibitor-free mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus maintenance in liver transplantation: the randomized spare-the-nephron trial.

Lewis Teperman1, Dilip Moonka, Anthony Sebastian, Linda Sher, Paul Marotta, Christopher Marsh, Baburao Koneru, John Goss, Dennis Preston, John P Roberts.   

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) have been used for calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization to reduce nephrotoxicity following liver transplantation. In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study, patients undergoing transplantation from July 2005 to June 2007 who were maintained on MMF/CNI were randomized 4 to 12 weeks after transplantation to receive MMF/SRL (n = 148) or continue MMF/CNI (n = 145) and included in the intent-to-treat population. The primary efficacy endpoints were the mean percentage change in the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft lost, death, and lost to follow-up 12 months after transplantation. Patients were followed for a median of 519 days after randomization. MMF/SRL was associated with a significantly greater renal function improvement from baseline with a mean percentage change in GFR of 19.7 ± 40.6 (versus 1.2 ± 39.9 for MMF/CNI, P = 0.0012). The composite endpoint demonstrated the noninferiority of MMF/SRL versus MMF/CNI (16.4% versus 15.4%, 90% confidence interval = -7.1% to 9.0%). The incidence of BPAR was significantly greater with MMF/SRL (12.2%) versus MMF/CNI (4.1%, P = 0.02). Graft loss (including death) occurred in 3.4% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and in 8.3% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.04). Malignancy-related deaths were less frequent with MMF/SRL. Adverse events caused withdrawal for 34.2% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and for 24.1% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.06). The use of MMF/SRL is an option for liver transplant recipients who can benefit from improved renal function but is associated with an increased risk of rejection (but not graft loss).
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775875     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  13 in total

1.  Key role of renal biopsy in management of progressive chronic kidney disease in liver graft recipients.

Authors:  Martin-Walter Welker; Nina Weiler; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Eva Herrmann; Christoph Betz; Mark Schöffauer; Stefan Zeuzem; Christoph Sarrazin; Kerstin Amann; Oliver Jung
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 2.  Natural Biopolymers as Additional Tools for Cell Microencapsulation Applied to Cellular Therapy.

Authors:  Liana Monteiro da Fonseca Cardoso; Tatiane Barreto; Jaciara Fernanda Gomes Gama; Luiz Anastacio Alves
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  Current strategies for immunosuppression following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel Nils Gotthardt; Helge Bruns; Karl Heinz Weiss; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Liver transplantation: Current status and challenges.

Authors:  Caroline C Jadlowiec; Timucin Taner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Protecting the Kidney in Liver Transplant Recipients: Practice-Based Recommendations From the American Society of Transplantation Liver and Intestine Community of Practice.

Authors:  J Levitsky; J G O'Leary; S Asrani; P Sharma; J Fung; A Wiseman; C U Niemann
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Maintenance immunosuppression for adults undergoing liver transplantation: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez; Marta Guerrero-Misas; Douglas Thorburn; Brian R Davidson; Emmanuel Tsochatzis; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  The benefit of sirolimus maintenance immunosuppression and rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in liver transplant recipients that develop acute kidney injury in the early postoperative period.

Authors:  Benjamin T Duhart; Winston A Ally; Amy G Krauss; Joanna Q Hudson; James D Eason; Vinaya Rao; Jason M Vanatta
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2015-03-11

8.  Effect of Early Everolimus-Facilitated Reduction of Tacrolimus on Efficacy and Renal Function in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients: 24-Month Results for the North American Subpopulation.

Authors:  William C Chapman; Robert S Brown; Kenneth D Chavin; Debra Sudan; Baburao Koneru; Guido Junge; Gaohong Dong; Dharmesh Patel; Lewis Teperman; John J Fung
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Efficacy and safety of a reduced calcineurin inhibitor dose combined with mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant patients with chronic renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Pusen Wang; Weitao Que; Hao Li; Lvnan Yan; Zhiren Fu; Qifa Ye; Guihua Chen; Kefeng Dou; Shichun Lu; Zhanyu Yang; Zhijun Zhu; Zhihai Peng; Lin Zhong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-18

10.  Discovery and validation of a novel blood-based molecular biomarker of rejection following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Josh Levitsky; Sumeet K Asrani; Thomas Schiano; Adyr Moss; Kenneth Chavin; Charles Miller; Kexin Guo; Lihui Zhao; Manoj Kandpal; Nancy Bridges; Merideth Brown; Brian Armstrong; Sunil Kurian; Anthony J Demetris; Michael Abecassis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.