Literature DB >> 23775602

Early diagnosis of complex diseases by molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and dynamical network biomarkers.

Rui Liu1, Xiangdong Wang, Kazuyuki Aihara, Luonan Chen.   

Abstract

Many studies have been carried out for early diagnosis of complex diseases by finding accurate and robust biomarkers specific to respective diseases. In particular, recent rapid advance of high-throughput technologies provides unprecedented rich information to characterize various disease genotypes and phenotypes in a global and also dynamical manner, which significantly accelerates the study of biomarkers from both theoretical and clinical perspectives. Traditionally, molecular biomarkers that distinguish disease samples from normal samples are widely adopted in clinical practices due to their ease of data measurement. However, many of them suffer from low coverage and high false-positive rates or high false-negative rates, which seriously limit their further clinical applications. To overcome those difficulties, network biomarkers (or module biomarkers) attract much attention and also achieve better performance because a network (or subnetwork) is considered to be a more robust form to characterize diseases than individual molecules. But, both molecular biomarkers and network biomarkers mainly distinguish disease samples from normal samples, and they generally cannot ensure to identify predisease samples due to their static nature, thereby lacking ability to early diagnosis. Based on nonlinear dynamical theory and complex network theory, a new concept of dynamical network biomarkers (DNBs, or a dynamical network of biomarkers) has been developed, which is different from traditional static approaches, and the DNB is able to distinguish a predisease state from normal and disease states by even a small number of samples, and therefore has great potential to achieve "real" early diagnosis of complex diseases. In this paper, we comprehensively review the recent advances and developments on molecular biomarkers, network biomarkers, and DNBs in particular, focusing on the biomarkers for early diagnosis of complex diseases considering a small number of samples and high-throughput data (or big data). Detailed comparisons of various types of biomarkers as well as their applications are also discussed.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  complex diseases; dynamical network biomarker; early diagnosis; molecular biomarker; network biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775602     DOI: 10.1002/med.21293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Res Rev        ISSN: 0198-6325            Impact factor:   12.944


  71 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers to guide clinical therapeutics in rheumatology?

Authors:  William H Robinson; Rong Mao
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 2.  Dynamic versus static biomarkers in cancer immune checkpoint blockade: unravelling complexity.

Authors:  W Joost Lesterhuis; Anthony Bosco; Michael J Millward; Michael Small; Anna K Nowak; Richard A Lake
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  A novel algorithm for finding optimal driver nodes to target control complex networks and its applications for drug targets identification.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Guo; Shao-Wu Zhang; Qian-Qian Shi; Cheng-Ming Zhang; Tao Zeng; Luonan Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Personalized characterization of diseases using sample-specific networks.

Authors:  Xiaoping Liu; Yuetong Wang; Hongbin Ji; Kazuyuki Aihara; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Conditional mutual inclusive information enables accurate quantification of associations in gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  Xiujun Zhang; Juan Zhao; Jin-Kao Hao; Xing-Ming Zhao; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Towards dynamical network biomarkers in neuromodulation of episodic migraine.

Authors:  Markus A Dahlem; Sebastian Rode; Arne May; Naoya Fujiwara; Yoshito Hirata; Kazuyuki Aihara; Jürgen Kurths
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.757

7.  Real-time, personalized medicine through wearable sensors and dynamic predictive modeling: a new paradigm for clinical medicine.

Authors:  Jonathan Tyler; Sung Won Choi; Muneesh Tewari
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-07

8.  Detecting the tipping points in a three-state model of complex diseases by temporal differential networks.

Authors:  Pei Chen; Yongjun Li; Xiaoping Liu; Rui Liu; Luonan Chen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Individual-specific edge-network analysis for disease prediction.

Authors:  Xiangtian Yu; Jingsong Zhang; Shaoyan Sun; Xin Zhou; Tao Zeng; Luonan Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Imaging non-classical mechanical responses of lipid membranes using molecular rotors.

Authors:  Miguel Páez-Pérez; Ismael López-Duarte; Aurimas Vyšniauskas; Nicholas J Brooks; Marina K Kuimova
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.