Literature DB >> 23775575

Biochemical basis of vocal fold mobilization after microflap surgery in a rabbit model.

Joshua R Mitchell1, Tsuyoshi Kojima, Hongmei Wu, C Gaelyn Garrett, Bernard Rousseau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate phonation-related extracellular matrix (ECM) changes in the vocal fold lamina propria after microflap surgery using an in vivo rabbit phonation model. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective animal study.
METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand White rabbits were used in this study. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry were used to investigate alterations in vocal fold ECM proinflammatory and profibrotic gene, and protein expression from a control group of animals receiving a microflap without phonation and a separate group of animals receiving experimentally induced phonation on postmicroflap days 0, 3, and 7.
RESULTS: IHC demonstrated the highest concentration of CD45 in vocal folds on postoperative day 0. Staining for CD45 was absent by postoperative day 7, with no differences in CD45 staining between groups. Fibronectin gene expression increased significantly on postoperative day 3 in the control and experimentally induced phonation groups, with maximal staining of fibronectin around the microflap incision on postoperative day 7. No alterations in cyclooxygenase-2, interleukin-1β, and transforming growth factor-β1 gene expression were observed between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the present study revealed an acute inflammatory response in the vocal fold at the time of microflap (day 0) and up to 3 days post-microflap. By post-operative day 3, staining of CD45 positive cells decreased, with essentially no evidence of inflammation by post-operative day 7. With the end of the acute inflammatory response occurring around day 3, these data may provide support for mobilizing tissue after inflammation has subsided and the process of active tissue remodeling has ensued (days 3-7). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene expression; immunohistochemistry; microflap; phonomicrosurgery; vocal fold; voice rest; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775575      PMCID: PMC4576344          DOI: 10.1002/lary.24263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  23 in total

1.  Voice rest after microlaryngoscopy: current opinion and practice.

Authors:  Alison Behrman; Lucian Sulica
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Vocal fold wound healing: a review for clinicians.

Authors:  Ryan C Branski; Katherine Verdolini; Vlad Sandulache; Clark A Rosen; Patricia A Hebda
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Altered CD45 expression and disease.

Authors:  Elma Z Tchilian; Peter C L Beverley
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 16.687

4.  Influence of phonation on basement membrane zone recovery after phonomicrosurgery: a canine model.

Authors:  S H Cho; H T Kim; I J Lee; M S Kim; H J Park
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring.

Authors:  Susan L Thibeault; Steven D Gray; Diane M Bless; Roger W Chan; Charles N Ford
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Immunohistochemical characterization of benign laryngeal lesions.

Authors:  M S Courey; J A Shohet; M A Scott; R H Ossoff
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Histological study of acute vocal fold injury in a rat model.

Authors:  Tomoko Tateya; Ichiro Tateya; Jin Ho Sohn; Diane M Bless
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Medial microflap for excision of benign vocal fold lesions.

Authors:  M S Courey; C G Garrett; R H Ossoff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Endoscopic vocal fold microflap: a three-year experience.

Authors:  M S Courey; G M Gardner; R E Stone; R H Ossoff
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 10.  Fibronectin: an interesting vocal fold protein.

Authors:  Scot D Hirschi; Steven D Gray; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  6 in total

1.  Recovery of vibratory function after vocal fold microflap in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kojima; Joshua R Mitchell; C Gaelyn Garrett; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Recovery of Vocal Fold Epithelium after Acute Phonotrauma.

Authors:  Bernard Rousseau; Tsuyoshi Kojima; Carolyn K Novaleski; Emily E Kimball; Carla V Valenzuela; Masanobu Mizuta; James J Daniero; C Gaelyn Garrett; M Preeti Sivasankar
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.481

3.  Structurally and functionally characterized in vitro model of rabbit vocal fold epithelium.

Authors:  Masanobu Mizuta; Takashi Kurita; Emily E Kimball; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  Tissue Cell       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.466

4.  The role of voice rest after micro-laryngeal surgery for benign vocal fold lesions.

Authors:  Jacob T Cohen; Eran Fridman; Vladimir Trushin; Limor Benyamini; Irit Duek; Shadi Shinnawi; Yosi Keshet; Alma Cohen; Miki Paker
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Voice Handicap Index Changes After Microflap Surgery for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions Are Not Associated With Recommended Absolute Voice Rest Duration.

Authors:  Renee E King; Carolyn K Novaleski; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  RNA sequencing identifies transcriptional changes in the rabbit larynx in response to low humidity challenge.

Authors:  Taylor W Bailey; Andrea Pires Dos Santos; Naila Cannes do Nascimento; Shaojun Xie; Jyothi Thimmapuram; M Preeti Sivasankar; Abigail Cox
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.