Literature DB >> 23775532

Prospective, randomized-controlled trial comparing postoperative pain after plug and patch open repair with totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

F Aigner1, F Augustin, C Kaufmann, A Schlager, H Ulmer, J Pratschke, T Schmid.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain between the open tension-free plug and patch (PP) technique and the totally extraperitoneal patch (TEP) hernioplasty.
METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four male patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo PP and TEP from 2005 to 2009. Pain assessment was conducted using the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire preoperatively, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. All patients received the same analgesic regimen and documented pain in a NRS-based 4-week diary.
RESULTS: Of the 154 patients 77 underwent TEP and 77 PP. Median follow-up was 3.8 years. One recurrent hernia was observed in the TEP and two in the PP group (p = 0.56). Median preoperative NRS scores were 2 and 2, 0.3 and 0.4 at 6 months, 0.1 and 0.3 at 12 months, 0.2 and 0.1 at 24 months postoperatively in the PP and TEP groups, respectively (p > 0.05). Data from the 4-week pain diaries revealed significant differences in pain intensity between the two different techniques from the second postoperative week (p < 0.05). Patients in the PP group required more additional analgesics on day four and five postoperatively (p = 0.037 and 0.015, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data favor the TEP technique concerning postoperative pain as primary endpoint between tension-free PP and TEP hernia repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775532     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1123-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  12 in total

Review 1.  Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Nienhuijs; Erik Staal; Luc Strobbe; Camiel Rosman; Hans Groenewoud; Rob Bleichrodt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  R D Kugel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Individualization of hernia repair: a new era.

Authors:  L M Nyhus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  S Alfieri; P K Amid; G Campanelli; G Izard; H Kehlet; A R Wijsmuller; D Di Miceli; G B Doglietto
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Liem; Y van der Graaf; C J van Steensel; R U Boelhouwer; G J Clevers; W S Meijer; L P Stassen; J P Vente; W F Weidema; A J Schrijvers; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Testicular functions, chronic groin pain, and quality of life after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anand Narayan Singh; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Mahesh C Misra; Subodh Kumar; S Rajeshwari; Atin Kumar; Rajesh Sagar; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique.

Authors:  I M Rutkow; A W Robbins
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.

Authors:  M P Simons; T Aufenacker; M Bay-Nielsen; J L Bouillot; G Campanelli; J Conze; D de Lange; R Fortelny; T Heikkinen; A Kingsnorth; J Kukleta; S Morales-Conde; P Nordin; V Schumpelick; S Smedberg; M Smietanski; G Weber; M Miserez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Lichtenstein vs anterior preperitoneal prosthetic mesh placement in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  R L Muldoon; K Marchant; D D Johnson; G G Yoder; R C Read; M Hauer-Jensen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Memon; N J Cooper; B Memon; M I Memon; K R Abrams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; F Lombardo; G Bonitta; A Morlacchi; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  S Harmankaya; S Öberg; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 3.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13

4.  Comparison of Lichtenstein Repair and Mesh Plug Repair Methods in The Treatment of Indirect Inguinal Hernia.

Authors:  Sebahattin Destek; Vahit Onur Gul
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.