BACKGROUND: The dorso-lateral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is considered as the usual target of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Nevertheless, the exact anatomical location of the electrode contacts used for chronic stimulation is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the existing literature on this issue. METHOD: We searched for studies on the anatomical location of active contacts published until December 2012. RESULTS: We identified 13 studies, published between 2002 and 2010, including 260 patients and 466 electrodes. One hundred and sixty-four active contacts (35 %) were identified within the STN, 117 (25 %) at the interface between STN and the surrounding structures, 184 (40 %) above the STN and one within the substantia nigra. We observed great discrepancies between the different series. The contra-lateral improvement was between 37 and 78.5 % for contacts located within the STN, between 48.6 and 73 % outside the STN, between 65.3 and 66 % at the interface. The authors report no clear correlation between anatomical location and stimulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative analysis of the anatomical location of active contacts is difficult, and all the methods used are debatable. The relationship between the anatomical location of active contacts and the clinical effectiveness of stimulation is unclear. It would be necessary to take into account the volume of the electrode contacts and the diffusion of the stimulation. We can nevertheless assume that the interface between dorso-lateral STN, zona incerta and Forel's fields could be directly involved in the effects of stimulation.
BACKGROUND: The dorso-lateral part of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is considered as the usual target of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. Nevertheless, the exact anatomical location of the electrode contacts used for chronic stimulation is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the existing literature on this issue. METHOD: We searched for studies on the anatomical location of active contacts published until December 2012. RESULTS: We identified 13 studies, published between 2002 and 2010, including 260 patients and 466 electrodes. One hundred and sixty-four active contacts (35 %) were identified within the STN, 117 (25 %) at the interface between STN and the surrounding structures, 184 (40 %) above the STN and one within the substantia nigra. We observed great discrepancies between the different series. The contra-lateral improvement was between 37 and 78.5 % for contacts located within the STN, between 48.6 and 73 % outside the STN, between 65.3 and 66 % at the interface. The authors report no clear correlation between anatomical location and stimulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative analysis of the anatomical location of active contacts is difficult, and all the methods used are debatable. The relationship between the anatomical location of active contacts and the clinical effectiveness of stimulation is unclear. It would be necessary to take into account the volume of the electrode contacts and the diffusion of the stimulation. We can nevertheless assume that the interface between dorso-lateral STN, zona incerta and Forel's fields could be directly involved in the effects of stimulation.
Authors: Andreas Horn; Ningfei Li; Till A Dembek; Ari Kappel; Chadwick Boulay; Siobhan Ewert; Anna Tietze; Andreas Husch; Thushara Perera; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Marco Reisert; Hang Si; Robert Oostenveld; Christopher Rorden; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Qianqian Fang; Todd M Herrington; Johannes Vorwerk; Andrea A Kühn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Robert Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Timon Merk; Victoria Peterson; Witold J Lipski; Benjamin Blankertz; Robert S Turner; Ningfei Li; Andreas Horn Journal: Elife Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Yasmine M Kehnemouyi; Kevin B Wilkins; Chioma M Anidi; Ross W Anderson; Muhammad Furqan Afzal; Helen M Bronte-Stewart Journal: Brain Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 15.255
Authors: Robert S Eisinger; Joshua Wong; Leonardo Almeida; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Jackson N Cagle; Juan C Giugni; Bilal Ahmed; Alberto R Bona; Erin Monari; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Christopher W Hess; Justin D Hilliard; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz; Michael S Okun; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2017-11-27
Authors: Kelsey A Nestor; Jacob D Jones; Christopher R Butson; Takashi Morishita; Charles E Jacobson; David A Peace; Dennis Chen; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240