P Bourgeat1, V Dore, V L Villemagne, C C Rowe, O Salvado, J Fripp. 1. CSIRO Preventative Health National Research Flagship ICTC, The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: As large-scale medical imaging studies are becoming more common, there is an increasing reliance on automated software to extract quantitative information from these images. As the size of the cohorts keeps increasing with large studies, there is a also a need for tools that allow results from automated image processing and analysis to be presented in a way that enables fast and efficient quality checking, tagging and reporting on cases in which automatic processing failed or was problematic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MilxXplore is an open source visualization platform, which provides an interface to navigate and explore imaging data in a web browser, giving the end user the opportunity to perform quality control and reporting in a user friendly, collaborative and efficient way. DISCUSSION: Compared to existing software solutions that often provide an overview of the results at the subject's level, MilxXplore pools the results of individual subjects and time points together, allowing easy and efficient navigation and browsing through the different acquisitions of a subject over time, and comparing the results against the rest of the population. CONCLUSIONS: MilxXplore is fast, flexible and allows remote quality checks of processed imaging data, facilitating data sharing and collaboration across multiple locations, and can be easily integrated into a cloud computing pipeline. With the growing trend of open data and open science, such a tool will become increasingly important to share and publish results of imaging analysis.
OBJECTIVE: As large-scale medical imaging studies are becoming more common, there is an increasing reliance on automated software to extract quantitative information from these images. As the size of the cohorts keeps increasing with large studies, there is a also a need for tools that allow results from automated image processing and analysis to be presented in a way that enables fast and efficient quality checking, tagging and reporting on cases in which automatic processing failed or was problematic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MilxXplore is an open source visualization platform, which provides an interface to navigate and explore imaging data in a web browser, giving the end user the opportunity to perform quality control and reporting in a user friendly, collaborative and efficient way. DISCUSSION: Compared to existing software solutions that often provide an overview of the results at the subject's level, MilxXplore pools the results of individual subjects and time points together, allowing easy and efficient navigation and browsing through the different acquisitions of a subject over time, and comparing the results against the rest of the population. CONCLUSIONS: MilxXplore is fast, flexible and allows remote quality checks of processed imaging data, facilitating data sharing and collaboration across multiple locations, and can be easily integrated into a cloud computing pipeline. With the growing trend of open data and open science, such a tool will become increasingly important to share and publish results of imaging analysis.
Authors: Arthur W Toga; Kristi A Clark; Paul M Thompson; David W Shattuck; John Darrell Van Horn Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kathryn A Ellis; Ashley I Bush; David Darby; Daniela De Fazio; Jonathan Foster; Peter Hudson; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Nat Lenzo; Ralph N Martins; Paul Maruff; Colin Masters; Andrew Milner; Kerryn Pike; Christopher Rowe; Greg Savage; Cassandra Szoeke; Kevin Taddei; Victor Villemagne; Michael Woodward; David Ames Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Federica Torri; Ivo D Dinov; Alen Zamanyan; Sam Hobel; Alex Genco; Petros Petrosyan; Andrew P Clark; Zhizhong Liu; Paul Eggert; Jonathan Pierce; James A Knowles; Joseph Ames; Carl Kesselman; Arthur W Toga; Steven G Potkin; Marquis P Vawter; Fabio Macciardi Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: L van Eijk; M Seidel; K Pannek; J M George; S Fiori; A Guzzetta; A Coulthard; J Bursle; R S Ware; D Bradford; S Rose; P B Colditz; R N Boyd; J Fripp Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Panagiotis D Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Daniel J Blezek; Steve G Langer; William J Ryan; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Radiographics Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 5.333