Literature DB >> 23774744

The role of skin conductivity in a low frequency exposure assessment for peripheral nerve tissue according to the ICNIRP 2010 guidelines.

Gernot Schmid1, Stefan Cecil, Richard Überbacher.   

Abstract

Based on numerical computations using commercially available finite difference time domain code and a state-of-the art anatomical model of a 5-year old child, the influence of skin conductivity on the induced electric field strength inside the tissue for homogeneous front-to-back magnetic field exposure and homogeneous vertical electric field exposure was computed. Both ungrounded as well as grounded conditions of the body model were considered. For electric field strengths induced inside CNS tissue the impact of skin conductivity was found to be less than 15%. However, the results demonstrated that the use of skin conductivity values as obtainable from the most widely used data base of dielectric tissue properties and recommended by safety standards are not suitable for exposure assessment with respect to peripheral nerve tissue according to the ICNIRP 2010 guidelines in which the use of the induced electric field strengths inside the skin is suggested as a conservative surrogate for peripheral nerve exposure. This is due to the fact that the skin conductivity values derived from these data bases refer to the stratum corneum, the uppermost layer of the skin, which does not contain any nerve or receptor cells to be protected from stimulation effects. Using these skin conductivity values which are approximately a factor 250-500 lower than skin conductivity values used in studies on which the ICNIRP 2010 guidelines are based on, may lead to overestimations of the induced electric field strengths inside the skin by substantially more than a factor of 10. However, reliable conductivity data of deeper skin layers where nerve and preceptor cells are located is very limited. It is therefore recommended to include appropriate background information in the ICNIRP guidelines and the dielectric tissue property databases, and to put some emphasis on a detailed layer-specific characterization of skin conductivity in near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23774744     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/4703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Electrical Characterisation of Aδ-Fibres Based on Human in vivo Electrostimulation Threshold.

Authors:  Shota Tanaka; Jose Gomez-Tames; Toshiaki Wasaka; Koji Inui; Shoogo Ueno; Akimasa Hirata
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  Protection of Workers Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields: A Perspective on Open Questions in the Context of the New ICNIRP 2020 Guidelines.

Authors:  Peter Jeschke; Carsten Alteköster; Kjell Hansson Mild; Michel Israel; Mihaela Ivanova; Klaus Schiessl; Tsvetelina Shalamanova; Florian Soyka; Rianne Stam; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Effects of a Wireless Charging System Built for An Electric Kick Scooter on Human Biological Tissue.

Authors:  Ibrahim Dergham; Yasser Alayli; Rodrigue Imad; Yskandar Hamam
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.