Literature DB >> 23774458

Comparison of postoperative infection between robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy.

Katsumi Shigemura1, Kazushi Tanaka, Fukashi Yamamichi, Mototsugu Muramaki, Soichi Arakawa, Hideaki Miyake, Masato Fujisawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has been rapidly adapted worldwide. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative infection (POI) after RALP and compare it with that after open radical prostatectomy (ORP).
METHODS: 89 consecutive RALP cases and 105 recent ORP cases were enrolled. POIs were categorized according to CDC guideline criteria. Laboratory data relating to infection such as serum white blood cells (WBC) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were comparatively investigated before and after the surgeries. Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: There was one surgical site infection patient in the RALP cases (1/89, 1.12%). ORP cases had a comparatively higher ratio of POI (6/105, 4.77%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0876). The postoperative rise of serum WBC (postoperative days 1 and 4) and CRP (postoperative days 1, 4 and 7) was significantly suppressed from pre-surgery data in RALP when compared to ORP.
CONCLUSIONS: RALP tended to have a lower rate of POI than ORP even though this change was not statistically significant and the postoperative rise of serum WBC and CRP was significantly suppressed in RALP compared to ORP. A prospective study with a standardized prophylactic antibiotic administration may be necessary for further evaluation of potential guidelines for RALP.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23774458     DOI: 10.1159/000350334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

1.  Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniar K Osmonov; Amr A Faddan; Alexey V Aksenov; Carsten M Naumann; Leonid M Rapoport; Evgeny A Bezrukov; Dmitry G Tsarichenko; Klaus P Jünemann
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07

2.  Long-term adverse effects after retropubic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Nationwide, population-based study.

Authors:  Jón Örn Fridriksson; Yasin Folkvaljon; Karl-Johan Lundström; David Robinson; Stefan Carlsson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Evaluation of Surgical Site Infection in Mini-invasive Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Jacopo Adolfo Rossi de Vermandois; Giovanni Cochetti; Michele Del Zingaro; Alberto Santoro; Mattia Panciarola; Andrea Boni; Matteo Marsico; Gianluca Gaudio; Alessio Paladini; Paolo Guiggi; Roberto Cirocchi; Ettore Mearini
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2019-09-15

4.  Post-surgical outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease and end stage renal disease undergoing radical prostatectomy: 10-year results from the US National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Chen Ning; Xinyi Hu; Fangming Liu; Jun Lin; Jian Zhang; Zhipeng Wang; Yichen Zhu
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.388

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.