OBJECTIVE: To assess worldwide trends in volume and methodological quality of published surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decade. BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials are essential for clinical decision making. It has repeatedly been suggested that surgical RCTs are scarce and of mediocre quality. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed for surgical RCTs published in 1999 and 2009. Characteristics and risks of bias were extracted. Trials where compared between study years and geographical regions. Primary outcome was "low risk of bias," defined by all of the following: adequate allocation generation and concealment, intention-to-treat analysis, and adequate dropout handling. RESULTS: The volume of published surgical RCTs increased by 50%, from 300 in 1999 to 450 in 2009. Volume increased in Europe (27% increase), Asia/Oceania (160% increase), and Africa/South America (416% increase) but decreased in North America (23% decrease), although the United States remained the country with the highest number of published RCTs. In 2009, methodological quality of surgical trials improved in terms of sample size calculation, adequate generation of randomization sequence, concealment of randomization sequence, and use of intention-to-treat analysis as compared with 1999 (P < 0.001 for all). The proportion of low risk of bias trials increased from 6% to 14% (prevalence ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 1.55-4.32). In 2009, the highest proportion of low risk of bias trials was from Europe (23%), whereas the lowest was from Asia/Oceania (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Volume and quality of surgical RCTs improved although striking differences exist between continents and countries. Structured education in trial methodology, enforced adherence to existing guidelines, and improved research infrastructure may guide further improvements.
OBJECTIVE: To assess worldwide trends in volume and methodological quality of published surgical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decade. BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials are essential for clinical decision making. It has repeatedly been suggested that surgical RCTs are scarce and of mediocre quality. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed for surgical RCTs published in 1999 and 2009. Characteristics and risks of bias were extracted. Trials where compared between study years and geographical regions. Primary outcome was "low risk of bias," defined by all of the following: adequate allocation generation and concealment, intention-to-treat analysis, and adequate dropout handling. RESULTS: The volume of published surgical RCTs increased by 50%, from 300 in 1999 to 450 in 2009. Volume increased in Europe (27% increase), Asia/Oceania (160% increase), and Africa/South America (416% increase) but decreased in North America (23% decrease), although the United States remained the country with the highest number of published RCTs. In 2009, methodological quality of surgical trials improved in terms of sample size calculation, adequate generation of randomization sequence, concealment of randomization sequence, and use of intention-to-treat analysis as compared with 1999 (P < 0.001 for all). The proportion of low risk of bias trials increased from 6% to 14% (prevalence ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 1.55-4.32). In 2009, the highest proportion of low risk of bias trials was from Europe (23%), whereas the lowest was from Asia/Oceania (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Volume and quality of surgical RCTs improved although striking differences exist between continents and countries. Structured education in trial methodology, enforced adherence to existing guidelines, and improved research infrastructure may guide further improvements.
Authors: Usama Ahmed Ali; Beata M M Reiber; Joren R Ten Hove; Pieter C van der Sluis; Hein G Gooszen; Marja A Boermeester; Marc G Besselink Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2017-06-04 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen; Cecilie Okholm; Hans-Christian Pommergaard; Jakob Burcharth; Jacob Rosenberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Belle V van Rosmalen; Ingo Alldinger; Kasia P Cieslak; Roos Wennink; Mike Clarke; Usama Ahmed Ali; Marc G H Besselink Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: D P J Smeeing; R M Houwert; M C Kruyt; O A J van der Meijden; F Hietbrink Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Nicola Rocco; Corrado Rispoli; Lorenzo Moja; Bruno Amato; Loredana Iannone; Serena Testa; Andrea Spano; Giuseppe Catanuto; Antonello Accurso; Maurizio B Nava Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-16