OBJECTIVE: Serous borderline tumor (SBT) is a unique histopathologic entity of the ovary, believed to be intermediate between benign cystadenoma and invasive low-grade serous carcinoma. While somatic mutations in the KRAS or BRAF, and rarely ERBB2, genes have been well characterized in SBTs, other genetic alterations have not been described. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular genetic architecture of SBTs, we undertook whole exome sequencing of this tumor type. METHODS: Following pathologic review and laser capture microdissection to enrich for tumor cells, whole exomes were prepared from DNA of two independent SBTs and subjected to massively parallel DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Both tumors contained an activating mutation of the BRAF gene. A total of 15 additional somatic mutations were identified, nine in one tumor and six in the other. Eleven were missense mutations and four were nonsense or deletion mutations. Fourteen of the 16 genes found to be mutated in this study have been reported to be mutated in other cancers. Furthermore, 12 of these genes are mutated in ovarian cancers. The FBXW7 and KIAA1462 genes are noteworthy candidates for a pathogenic role in serous borderline tumorigenesis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a very small number of somatic genetic mutations are characteristic of SBTs of the ovary, thus supporting their classification as a relatively genetically stable tumor type. The mutant genes described herein represent novel candidates for the pathogenesis of ovarian SBT.
OBJECTIVE:Serous borderline tumor (SBT) is a unique histopathologic entity of the ovary, believed to be intermediate between benign cystadenoma and invasive low-grade serous carcinoma. While somatic mutations in the KRAS or BRAF, and rarely ERBB2, genes have been well characterized in SBTs, other genetic alterations have not been described. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular genetic architecture of SBTs, we undertook whole exome sequencing of this tumor type. METHODS: Following pathologic review and laser capture microdissection to enrich for tumor cells, whole exomes were prepared from DNA of two independent SBTs and subjected to massively parallel DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Both tumors contained an activating mutation of the BRAF gene. A total of 15 additional somatic mutations were identified, nine in one tumor and six in the other. Eleven were missense mutations and four were nonsense or deletion mutations. Fourteen of the 16 genes found to be mutated in this study have been reported to be mutated in other cancers. Furthermore, 12 of these genes are mutated in ovarian cancers. The FBXW7 and KIAA1462 genes are noteworthy candidates for a pathogenic role in serous borderline tumorigenesis. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a very small number of somatic genetic mutations are characteristic of SBTs of the ovary, thus supporting their classification as a relatively genetically stable tumor type. The mutant genes described herein represent novel candidates for the pathogenesis of ovarian SBT.
Authors: Nisha Nanda; Ming Bao; Hanna Lin; Karl Clauser; Laszlo Komuves; Thomas Quertermous; Pamela B Conley; David R Phillips; Matthew J Hart Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Shizhen Emily Wang; Archana Narasanna; Marianela Perez-Torres; Bin Xiang; Frederick Y Wu; Seungchan Yang; Graham Carpenter; Adi F Gazdar; Senthil K Muthuswamy; Carlos L Arteaga Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: S C Mok; D A Bell; R C Knapp; P M Fishbaugh; W R Welch; M G Muto; R S Berkowitz; S W Tsao Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nathalie L G Sieben; Patricia Macropoulos; Guido M J M Roemen; Sandra M Kolkman-Uljee; Gert Jan Fleuren; Rifat Houmadi; Tim Diss; Bretta Warren; Mudher Al Adnani; Anton P M De Goeij; Thomas Krausz; Adrienne M Flanagan Journal: J Pathol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Shahab Akhoondi; Dahui Sun; Natalie von der Lehr; Sophia Apostolidou; Kathleen Klotz; Alena Maljukova; Diana Cepeda; Heidi Fiegl; Dimitra Dafou; Dimitra Dofou; Christian Marth; Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner; Martin Corcoran; Markus Dagnell; Sepideh Zabihi Nejad; Babak Noori Nayer; Mohammad Reza Zali; Johan Hansson; Susanne Egyhazi; Fredrik Petersson; Per Sangfelt; Hans Nordgren; Dan Grander; Steven I Reed; Martin Widschwendter; Olle Sangfelt; Charles Spruck Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rajmohan Murali; Pier Selenica; David N Brown; R Keira Cheetham; Raghu Chandramohan; Nidia L Claros; Nancy Bouvier; Donavan T Cheng; Robert A Soslow; Britta Weigelt; W Glenn McCluggage Journal: Histopathology Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Rachel N Grisham; Brooke E Sylvester; Helen Won; Gregory McDermott; Deborah DeLair; Ricardo Ramirez; Zhan Yao; Ronglai Shen; Fanny Dao; Faina Bogomolniy; Vicky Makker; Evis Sala; Tara E Soumerai; David M Hyman; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; David M Gershenson; John Farley; Douglas A Levine; Neal Rosen; Michael F Berger; David R Spriggs; Carol A Aghajanian; David B Solit; Gopa Iyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura Ardighieri; Felix Zeppernick; Charlotte G Hannibal; Russell Vang; Leslie Cope; Jette Junge; Susanne K Kjaer; Robert J Kurman; Ie-Ming Shih Journal: J Pathol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Ae Lee Jeong; Sora Han; Sunyi Lee; Jeong Su Park; Yiling Lu; Shuangxing Yu; Jane Li; Kyung-Hee Chun; Gordon B Mills; Young Yang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sally M Hunter; Michael S Anglesio; Georgina L Ryland; Raghwa Sharma; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Simone M Rowley; Maria A Doyle; Jason Li; C Blake Gilks; Phillip Moss; Prue E Allan; Andrew N Stephens; David G Huntsman; Anna deFazio; David D Bowtell; Kylie L Gorringe; Ian G Campbell Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-11-10