Literature DB >> 23774173

Impact of molecular analysis on the final sarcoma diagnosis: a study on 763 cases collected during a European epidemiological study.

Agnes Neuville1, Dominique Ranchère-Vince, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Maria Cristina Montesco, Isabelle Hostein, Luisa Toffolatti, Frédéric Chibon, Daniel Pissaloux, Laurent Alberti, Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere, Sabrina Albert, Carlo Riccardo Rossi, Jean-Yves Blay, Jean-Michel Coindre.   

Abstract

Sarcomas are rare, heterogenous, and often difficult to classify. A large proportion of sarcomas are associated with specific molecular genetic lesions such as translocations, mutations, and amplifications, which are helpful in the diagnosis of individual cases. However, the exact impact of molecular genetics on the final diagnosis of sarcomas is unknown. In this study, all soft tissue and visceral sarcomas arising in patients living in 3 European regions in 2 countries (representing 13 million inhabitants) were collected and reviewed during 2 consecutive years. A molecular analysis was performed for all suspicions of sarcomas with specific genetic lesions [mutations of KIT/PDGFRA in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), reciprocal translocation, or amplification of MDM2 in atypical lipomatous tumors, well-differentiated liposarcoma-dedifferentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS-DDLPS)]. To evaluate the impact of molecular tests, a premolecular analysis diagnosis was proposed with 3 categories of certainty: certain, probable, or possible. A molecular analysis was performed in 763/1484 tumors corresponding to 295 cases in which GIST was suspected, 248 sarcomas with a suspicion of translocation, and 220 cases in which ALT/WDLPS-DDLPS was suspected. Molecular analysis was found to be useful (confirms a probable diagnosis) in 11 (4%) GISTs, 62 (26%) suspicions of translocation, and 66 (31%) suspicions of ALT/WDLPS-DDLPS; and necessary (allows a possible diagnosis) in 2 (<1%) GISTs, 31 (12%) suspicions of translocation, and 19 (9%) suspicions of ALT/WDLPS-DDLPS. This study performed in an epidemiological setting demonstrates the significant impact of molecular analysis on the final sarcoma diagnosis and favors such an analysis on any tumor with a suspicion of a specific genomic abnormality and for which the diagnosis is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23774173     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31828f51b9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  15 in total

1.  Expanded molecular profiling of myxofibrosarcoma reveals potentially actionable targets.

Authors:  Ellen Heitzer; Sandra Sunitsch; Magdalena M Gilg; Birgit Lohberger; Beate Rinner; Karl Kashofer; Nicole Stündl; Peter Ulz; Joanna Szkandera; Andreas Leithner; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  [Interdisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities].

Authors:  J Jakob; T Henzler; B Kasper; A Marx; P Hohenberger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  The pathology of soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Marta Sbaraglia; Angelo P Dei Tos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  [Epidemiological and histopathological aspects of sarcomas in Cotonou (Benin) from 2010 to 2020].

Authors:  Dansou Gaspard Gbessi; Freddy Houéhanou Rodrigue Gnangnon; Falilatou Seidou; Myrethe Olouwafemi Adanzounnon; Sègla Pascal Éric Chigblo; Yacoubou Imorou Souaïbou; Sètondji Gilles Roger Attolou; Francis Moïse Dossou; Aristote Hans-Moevi Akue; Flore Gangbo; Delphin Kuassi Mehinto
Journal:  Med Trop Sante Int       Date:  2022-01-27

5.  The comparative utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Khin Thway; Jayson Wang; Dorte Wren; Melissa Dainton; David Gonzalez; John Swansbury; Cyril Fisher
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis is a helpful test for the diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Authors:  Marie Karanian; Gaëlle Pérot; Jean-Michel Coindre; Frédéric Chibon; Florence Pedeutour; Agnès Neuville
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Molecular pathological analysis of sarcomas using paraffin-embedded tissue: current limitations and future possibilities.

Authors:  Matt van de Rijn; Xiangqian Guo; Robert T Sweeney; Andrew H Beck; Robert B West
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Genomically Complex Human Angiosarcoma and Canine Hemangiosarcoma Establish Convergent Angiogenic Transcriptional Programs Driven by Novel Gene Fusions.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Kim; Kate Megquier; Rachael Thomas; Aaron L Sarver; Jung Min Song; Yoon Tae Kim; Nuojin Cheng; Ashley J Schulte; Michael A Linden; Paari Murugan; LeAnn Oseth; Colleen L Forster; Ingegerd Elvers; Ross Swofford; Jason Turner-Maier; Elinor K Karlsson; Matthew Breen; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Jaime F Modiano
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.333

9.  Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for MDM2 Amplification as a Routine Ancillary Diagnostic Tool for Suspected Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas: Experience at a Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Khin Thway; Jayson Wang; John Swansbury; Toon Min; Cyril Fisher
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2015-02-25

10.  Histopathological diagnostic discrepancies in soft tissue tumours referred to a specialist centre: reassessment in the era of ancillary molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Khin Thway; Jayson Wang; Taka Mubako; Cyril Fisher
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2014-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.