AIM: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is a surgical technique that has showed increasingly good results, particularly in endocrine surgery centers. The aim of this prospective, non-randomized study was to evaluate feasibility, advantages and critical aspects of MIVAT in a general surgery unit. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-four patients underwent total thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease from May, 2008 to April, 2011. They were divided into two groups: one underwent conventional thyroidectomy (CT), and the other underwent MIVAT. The inclusion criteria were thyroid volume ≤35 mL and main nodule size ≤35 mm. For each patient, socio-demographic variables, hospitalization data and outcome measures (complication rate, operating time, post-operative pain, observer and patient scar assessment scale [OSAS and PSAS, respectively]) were collected. Multivariate regression analyses were done to assess the principal covariates affecting these outcome measures. RESULTS: There were 125 MIVATs and 99 CTs performed. The two groups were characterized by difference in age (38.4 vs. 50.9 years) and thyroid volume (18.6 vs. 23.3 mL). OSAS/PSAS scores were statistically significant in the MIVAT group (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) even after adjusting for age and thyroid volume. Complication rate was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: MIVAT significantly decreased postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results. It can be performed in younger patients and in all cases in which there is a clear indication for the procedure. Its advantages were confirmed in a general surgery unit where correct indications were followed.
AIM: Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is a surgical technique that has showed increasingly good results, particularly in endocrine surgery centers. The aim of this prospective, non-randomized study was to evaluate feasibility, advantages and critical aspects of MIVAT in a general surgery unit. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-four patients underwent total thyroidectomy for benign thyroid disease from May, 2008 to April, 2011. They were divided into two groups: one underwent conventional thyroidectomy (CT), and the other underwent MIVAT. The inclusion criteria were thyroid volume ≤35 mL and main nodule size ≤35 mm. For each patient, socio-demographic variables, hospitalization data and outcome measures (complication rate, operating time, post-operative pain, observer and patient scar assessment scale [OSAS and PSAS, respectively]) were collected. Multivariate regression analyses were done to assess the principal covariates affecting these outcome measures. RESULTS: There were 125 MIVATs and 99 CTs performed. The two groups were characterized by difference in age (38.4 vs. 50.9 years) and thyroid volume (18.6 vs. 23.3 mL). OSAS/PSAS scores were statistically significant in the MIVAT group (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) even after adjusting for age and thyroid volume. Complication rate was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: MIVAT significantly decreased postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results. It can be performed in younger patients and in all cases in which there is a clear indication for the procedure. Its advantages were confirmed in a general surgery unit where correct indications were followed.
Authors: C Raspanti; C Porrello; G Augello; A Dafnomili; G Rotolo; A Randazzo; N Falco; T Fontana; R Tutino; G Gulotta Journal: G Chir Date: 2017 Jan-Feb
Authors: G Scerrino; M Attard; C Lo Piccolo; A Attard; G I Melfa; C Raspanti; M Zarcone; S Bonventre; S Mazzola; G Gulotta Journal: G Chir Date: 2016 May-Jun
Authors: G Scerrino; A Inviati; S Di Giovanni; N C Paladino; S Di Giovanni; N C Paladino; V Di Paola; C Raspanti; G I Melfa; F Cupido; S Mazzola; C Porrello; S Bonventre; G Gullotta Journal: G Chir Date: 2017 Sep-Oct
Authors: G Melfa; C Porello; G Cocorullo; C Raspanti; G Rotolo; A Attard; R Gullo; S Bonventre; G Gulotta; G Scerrino Journal: G Chir Date: 2018 Jan-Feb