BACKGROUND: The cholinergic system is substantially altered in individuals with major depression and is partially restored when depression remits. We quantified the availability of β2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (β2*-nAChR) in subjects with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects with bipolar disorder (15 depressed, 10 euthymic) and 25 sex- and age-matched control subjects had a [(123)I]5IA-85380 single photon emission computed tomography scan to quantify β2*-nAChR VT/fP (total volume of distribution, corrected for individual differences in metabolism and protein binding of the radiotracer). Average VT/fP was compared between groups and correlated with clinical characteristics. Postmortem analysis of β2*-nAChRs was conducted using equilibrium binding with [(125)I]5IA in subjects with bipolar disorder and matched control subjects. RESULTS: We showed significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability (20%-38%) in subjects with bipolar depression compared with euthymic and control subjects across all brain regions assessed (frontal, parietal, temporal, and anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, striatum). The postmortem binding study in which endogenous acetylcholine was washed out did not show a statistically significant difference in β2*-nAChR number in temporal cortex of the bipolar depressed and control groups (15% difference; p = .2). CONCLUSIONS: We show that the alteration in the cholinergic system observed during a depressive episode appears to resolve during euthymia. We suggest that lower VT/fP observed in vivo may be due to a combination of higher endogenous acetylcholine levels during depression, which could compete with radiotracer binding to the receptor in vivo, and lower receptor number in bipolar depression. Identification of differences in cholinergic signaling in subjects with bipolar depression may improve our understanding of its etiology and reveal new treatment targets.
BACKGROUND: The cholinergic system is substantially altered in individuals with major depression and is partially restored when depression remits. We quantified the availability of β2-subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (β2*-nAChR) in subjects with bipolar disorder. METHODS: Twenty-five subjects with bipolar disorder (15 depressed, 10 euthymic) and 25 sex- and age-matched control subjects had a [(123)I]5IA-85380 single photon emission computed tomography scan to quantify β2*-nAChRVT/fP (total volume of distribution, corrected for individual differences in metabolism and protein binding of the radiotracer). Average VT/fP was compared between groups and correlated with clinical characteristics. Postmortem analysis of β2*-nAChRs was conducted using equilibrium binding with [(125)I]5IA in subjects with bipolar disorder and matched control subjects. RESULTS: We showed significantly lower β2*-nAChR availability (20%-38%) in subjects with bipolar depression compared with euthymic and control subjects across all brain regions assessed (frontal, parietal, temporal, and anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, thalamus, striatum). The postmortem binding study in which endogenous acetylcholine was washed out did not show a statistically significant difference in β2*-nAChR number in temporal cortex of the bipolar depressed and control groups (15% difference; p = .2). CONCLUSIONS: We show that the alteration in the cholinergic system observed during a depressive episode appears to resolve during euthymia. We suggest that lower VT/fP observed in vivo may be due to a combination of higher endogenous acetylcholine levels during depression, which could compete with radiotracer binding to the receptor in vivo, and lower receptor number in bipolar depression. Identification of differences in cholinergic signaling in subjects with bipolar depression may improve our understanding of its etiology and reveal new treatment targets.
Authors: C R Breese; M J Lee; C E Adams; B Sullivan; J Logel; K M Gillen; M J Marks; A C Collins; S Leonard Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Lewis L Judd; Hagop S Akiskal; Pamela J Schettler; Jean Endicott; Jack Maser; David A Solomon; Andrew C Leon; John A Rice; Martin B Keller Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-06
Authors: Masahiro Fujita; Mohammed S Al-Tikriti; Gilles Tamagnan; Sami S Zoghbi; Ali Bozkurt; Ronald M Baldwin; Robert B Innis Journal: Synapse Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; Mark A Geyer; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Brook L Henry; Jared W Young Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Yann S Mineur; Gianna M Fote; Sam Blakeman; Emma L M Cahuzac; Sylvia A Newbold; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; David S Janowsky; Berend Olivier; Arpi Minassian; William Perry; Jared W Young; Mark A Geyer Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Jordy van Enkhuizen; Morgane Milienne-Petiot; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-07-05 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Yann S Mineur; Matthew P Bentham; Wen-Liang Zhou; Margreet E Plantenga; Sherry A McKee; Marina R Picciotto Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Irina Esterlis; Mohini Ranganathan; Frederic Bois; Brian Pittman; Marina R Picciotto; Lara Shearer; Alan Anticevic; Jon Carlson; Mark J Niciu; Kelly P Cosgrove; D Cyril D'Souza Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 13.382