BACKGROUND: Molecular analysis has become important in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) evaluation. Alterations in KRAS, BRAF, or mismatch repair (MMR) genes may determine therapeutic response or define a hereditary cancer syndrome. Correlation of DNA studies with clinical findings will further clarify the clinical utility of these markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 111 paraffin-embedded tumor specimens submitted for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing based on clinical history or histologic examination, or both. DNA samples were screened for 7 KRAS mutations and the BRAF p.V600E mutation using fluorescent allele-specific polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) and capillary electrophoresis. Clinical data were collected through chart review. RESULTS: Fifty-eight male and 53 female patients were studied. The incidence of KRAS and BRAF mutations was 49.5% and 7.2%, respectively. Dideoxy sequencing verified KRAS mutation status in 46 of 49 specimens tested. There was a trend toward significance of individual KRAS mutations on survival (P = .003). Dually positive KRAS and MSI tumors exclusively demonstrated p.G12D and p.G13D mutations (G>A transitions). BRAF-mutated tumors were predominantly right-sided and associated with a borderline worse prognosis. Forty-eight percent of tumors with MSI were present in the left colon or rectum. CONCLUSION: Allele-specific PCR is an accurate and convenient method to assess KRAS and BRAF mutations and may detect mutations not identified by dideoxy sequencing. KRAS mutation status, in conjunction with morphologic or clinical parameters, may be useful in determining whether a tumor should be tested for MSI. MSI testing should not be considered exclusively in right-sided lesions. BRAF analysis may not be useful in rectal adenocarcinomas and should be evaluated in larger studies.
BACKGROUND: Molecular analysis has become important in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) evaluation. Alterations in KRAS, BRAF, or mismatch repair (MMR) genes may determine therapeutic response or define a hereditary cancer syndrome. Correlation of DNA studies with clinical findings will further clarify the clinical utility of these markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 111 paraffin-embedded tumor specimens submitted for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing based on clinical history or histologic examination, or both. DNA samples were screened for 7 KRAS mutations and the BRAF p.V600E mutation using fluorescent allele-specific polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) and capillary electrophoresis. Clinical data were collected through chart review. RESULTS: Fifty-eight male and 53 female patients were studied. The incidence of KRAS and BRAF mutations was 49.5% and 7.2%, respectively. Dideoxy sequencing verified KRAS mutation status in 46 of 49 specimens tested. There was a trend toward significance of individual KRAS mutations on survival (P = .003). Dually positive KRAS and MSI tumors exclusively demonstrated p.G12D and p.G13D mutations (G>A transitions). BRAF-mutated tumors were predominantly right-sided and associated with a borderline worse prognosis. Forty-eight percent of tumors with MSI were present in the left colon or rectum. CONCLUSION: Allele-specific PCR is an accurate and convenient method to assess KRAS and BRAF mutations and may detect mutations not identified by dideoxy sequencing. KRAS mutation status, in conjunction with morphologic or clinical parameters, may be useful in determining whether a tumor should be tested for MSI. MSI testing should not be considered exclusively in right-sided lesions. BRAF analysis may not be useful in rectal adenocarcinomas and should be evaluated in larger studies.
Authors: Carla Oliveira; Jantine L Westra; Diego Arango; Miina Ollikainen; Enric Domingo; Ana Ferreira; Sérgia Velho; Renee Niessen; Kristina Lagerstedt; Pia Alhopuro; Paivi Laiho; Isabel Veiga; Manuel R Teixeira; Marjolijn Ligtenberg; Jan H Kleibeuker; Rolf H Sijmons; John T Plukker; Kohzoh Imai; Pedro Lage; Richard Hamelin; Cristina Albuquerque; Simo Schwartz; Annika Lindblom; Päivi Peltomaki; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Lauri A Aaltonen; Raquel Seruca; Robert M W Hofstra Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2004-08-04 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Christine M Ribic; Daniel J Sargent; Malcolm J Moore; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Richard M Goldberg; Stanley R Hamilton; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Robert Gryfe; Lois E Shepherd; Dongsheng Tu; Mark Redston; Steven Gallinger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Guoren Deng; Ian Bell; Suzanne Crawley; James Gum; Jonathan P Terdiman; Brian A Allen; Brindusa Truta; Marvin H Sleisenger; Young S Kim Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marco Gerlinger; Andrew J Rowan; Stuart Horswell; James Larkin; David Endesfelder; Eva Gronroos; Pierre Martinez; Nicholas Matthews; Aengus Stewart; Charles Swanton; M Math; Patrick Tarpey; Ignacio Varela; Benjamin Phillimore; Sharmin Begum; Neil Q McDonald; Adam Butler; David Jones; Keiran Raine; Calli Latimer; Claudio R Santos; Mahrokh Nohadani; Aron C Eklund; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Graham Clark; Lisa Pickering; Gordon Stamp; Martin Gore; Zoltan Szallasi; Julian Downward; P Andrew Futreal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Y Y Juo; F M Johnston; D Y Zhang; H H Juo; H Wang; E P Pappou; T Yu; H Easwaran; S Baylin; M van Engeland; N Ahuja Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ahmet Yilmaz; Nehad Mohamed; Kara A Patterson; Yan Tang; Konstantin Shilo; Miguel A Villalona-Calero; Michael E Davis; Xiao-Ping Zhou; Wendy Frankel; Gregory A Otterson; Weiqiang Zhao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hassan Ashktorab; Sadhna Ahuja; Lakshmi Kannan; Xavier Llor; Nathan A Ellis; Rosa M Xicola; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; John M Carethers; Hassan Brim; Mehdi Nouraie Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-04-23
Authors: Stephanie J Blocker; Kirk A Douglas; Lisa Anne Polin; Helen Lee; Bart S Hendriks; Enxhi Lalo; Wei Chen; Anthony F Shields Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 11.556