Literature DB >> 23773342

The influence of working memory capacity on experimental heat pain.

Aya Nakae1, Kaori Endo, Tomonori Adachi, Takashi Ikeda, Satoshi Hagihira, Takashi Mashimo, Mariko Osaka.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Pain processing and attention have a bidirectional interaction that depends upon one's relative ability to use limited-capacity resources. However, correlations between the size of limited-capacity resources and pain have not been evaluated. Working memory capacity, which is a cognitive resource, can be measured using the reading span task (RST). In this study, we hypothesized that an individual's potential working memory capacity and subjective pain intensity are related. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated 31 healthy participants' potential working memory capacity using the RST, and then applied continuous experimental heat stimulation using the listening span test (LST), which is a modified version of the RST. Subjective pain intensities were significantly lower during the challenging parts of the RST. The pain intensity under conditions where memorizing tasks were performed was compared with that under the control condition, and it showed a correlation with potential working memory capacity. These results indicate that working memory capacity reflects the ability to process information, including precise evaluations of changes in pain perception. PERSPECTIVE: In this work, we present data suggesting that changes in subjective pain intensity are related, depending upon individual potential working memory capacities. Individual working memory capacity may be a phenotype that reflects sensitivity to changes in pain perception.
Copyright © 2013 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Working memory capacity; heat pain; individual difference; listening span test; reading span test

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773342     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  4 in total

1.  Pain and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Aging.

Authors:  Josue Cardoso; Brandon Apagueno; Paige Lysne; Lorraine Hoyos; Eric Porges; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim; Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Nonlinear Effects of Noxious Thermal Stimulation and Working Memory Demands on Subjective Pain Perception.

Authors:  John A Sturgeon; Meghan M Tieu; Laura E Jastrzab; Rebecca McCue; Vanisha Gandhi; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.637

3.  Mapping the Parameter Space of tDCS and Cognitive Control via Manipulation of Current Polarity and Intensity.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Zuzanna Z Balewski; Roy H Hamilton; John D Medaglia; Nathan Tardiff; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Sensory cognitive abnormalities of pain in autism spectrum disorder: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yuka Yasuda; Ryota Hashimoto; Aya Nakae; Hongling Kang; Kazutaka Ohi; Hidenaga Yamamori; Michiko Fujimoto; Satoshi Hagihira; Masatoshi Takeda
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.455

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.