| Literature DB >> 23773275 |
Takashi Iwakiri, Shouichi Fujimoto, Kiyoki Kitagawa, Kengo Furuichi, Junya Yamahana, Yunosuke Matsuura, Atsushi Yamashita, Shigehiro Uezono, Yoshiya Shimao, Shuichi Hisanaga, Takeshi Tokura, Takashi Wada, Kazuo Kitamura, Yujiro Asada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A new histopathological classification of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis was recently proposed. We evaluated the predictive value of this classification for renal outcome in Japanese patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23773275 PMCID: PMC3704260 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Patient characteristics at the time of diagnosis
| Age (years) | 66.3 ± 11.3 | 66.3 ± 12.2 | 66.3 ± 7.7 | n.s. |
| Male/female, | 54/48 | 39/40 | 15/8 | n.s. |
| MPO-ANCA, | 86 | 70 | 16 | |
| PR3-ANCA, | 5 | 4 | 1 | |
| Both negative, | 11 | 5 | 6 | |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 21.6 (11.5–39.5) | 25.7 (17.4–50.4) | 9.0 (5.1–13.3) | <0.001 |
| Serum albumin (g/dl) | 3.1 (2.7–3.7) | 3.1 (2.7–3.7) | 3.1 (2.7–3.8) | n.s. |
| Serum CRP (mg/dl) | 3.35 (0.98–8.98) | 3.70 (1.08–10.0) | 2.13 (0.20–6.70) | n.s. |
| Proteinuria (g/day) | 1.10 (0.35–2.12) | 0.70 (0.30–1.77) | 1.80 (1.10–2.50) | <0.01 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Abbreviations: ESRD end-stage renal disease, ns not significant, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MPO myeloperoxidase, PR3 proteinase-3, CRP C-reactive protein.
Baseline characteristics of patients in each histopathological class
| Age (years) | 66.1 ± 11.4 | 66.3 ± 12.5 | 66.7 ± 10.2 | 67.5 ± 8.6 | n.s. |
| Male/female, | 24/22 | 15/17 | 10/8 | 5/1 | n.s. |
| MPO-ANCA, | 40 | 26 | 15 | 5 | n.s. |
| PR3-ANCA, | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Both negative, | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 38.1 (22.5–57.4) | 12.0 (7.1–19.7) | 16.5 (8.7–31.6) | 12.4 (9.8–27.4) | <0.0001 |
| Serum albumin (g/dl) | 3.4 (2.8–3.7) | 2.7 (2.4–3.3) | 3.1 (2.8–3.7) | 3.8 (3.5–3.9) | <0.01 |
| Serum CRP (mg/dl) | 4.13 (1.43–9.62) | 4.98 (1.65–14.0) | 1.21 (0.10–3.93) | 0.16 (0.10–1.10) | <0.001 |
| Proteinuria (g/day) | 0.35 (0.21–0.79) | 1.50 (1.04–2.50) | 1.75 (1.07–2.20) | 1.50 (0.25–3.98) | <0.0001 |
| Immunosuppressants, yes/no, | 25/21 | 17/15 | 4/14 | 1/5 | <0.05 |
| Histopathological findings | | | | | |
| Normal glomeruli (%) | 73.2 (60.0–81.6) | 17.9 (10.6–28.0) | 35.4 (22.5–43.8) | 11.3 (0–22.0) | <0.0001 |
| Crescentic glomeruli (%) | 13.8 (8.9–23.6) | 67.7 (60.0–74.7) | 31.4 (15.6–40.4) | 12.4 (3.3–22.4) | <0.0001 |
| Globally sclerotic glomeruli (%) | 6.5 (0–13.4) | 3.2 (0–13.1) | 29.3 (19.0–40.4) | 64.5 (54.9–71.1) | <0.0001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range).
Abbreviations: ns not significant, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, MPO myeloperoxidase, PR3 proteinase-3, CRP C-reactive protein Immunosuppressants were administered after the diagnosis of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.
eGFR: focal vs. crescentic***, focal vs. mixed**, focal vs. sclerotic*, Serum albumin: focal vs. crescentic*, crescentic vs. sclerotic**, Serum CRP: focal vs. mixed*, focal vs. sclerotic*, crescentic vs. mixed*, crescentic vs. sclerotic**, Proteinuria: focal vs. crescentic***, focal vs. mixed**, Immunosuppressants: focal vs. mixed*, crescentic vs. mixed*, Normal glomeruli: focal vs. crescentic***, focal vs. mixed***, focal vs. sclerotic***, Sclerotic glomeruli: focal vs. crescentic***, crescentic vs. mixed***, crescentic vs. sclerotic***, Globally sclerotic glomeruli: focal vs. mixed***, focal vs. sclerotic***, crescentic vs. mixed***, crescentic vs. sclerotic***, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1Association between histopathological class and eGFR. eGFRs at diagnosis and 1 year after diagnosis were higher in the focal class than in the other classes. There were no significant differences in eGFR among the crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic class. Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; blank circles, median values; error bars, interquartile ranges. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 (post hoc analysis).
Proportions of ESRD according to the histopathological classes
| Focal | 1/46 (2.2%) | 2/46 (4.3%) |
| Crescentic | 7/32 (21.9%) | 9/32 (28.1%) |
| Mixed | 2/18 (11.1%) | 8/18 (44.4%) |
| Sclerotic | 2/6 (33.3%) | 4/6 (66.6%) |
Figure 2Renal survival during follow up. Overall, 23/102 patients developed ESRD during the total follow-up period. Renal survival was best in the focal class and worst in the sclerotic class. There was no significant difference between crescentic and mixed class regarding renal survival.
Multivariate analysis of progression to ESRD
| Age | 0.2336 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) |
| Male | 0.1072 | 2.33 (0.84–7.08) |
| eGFR at diagnosis | 0.0619 | 0.97 (0.93–1.00) |
| Proteinuria at diagnosis | 0.1059 | 1.23 (0.95–1.54) |
| Immunosuppressant, yes/no | 0.8390 | 0.90 (0.31–2.45) |
| Histopathological classification | 0.0686 | crescentic vs. focal, 2.99 (0.61–22.7) |
| mixed vs. focal, 5.04 (1.11–36.4) | ||
| sclerotic vs. focal, 9.93 (1.53–85.7) |
Abbreviations: ESRD end-stage renal disease, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.
Figure 3Comparison of renal survival according to α-SMA expression in crescentic and mixed classes. (A) Tissue section showing absence of α-SMA staining in a normal glomerulus, except in the glomerular vascular pole and thickened Bowman’s capsule. (B) Tissue section showing marked α-SMA expression in a normal glomerulus, suggesting activation of a mesangial cell. (C) Higher α-SMA positivity tended to be associated with poor renal survival. Abbreviation: SMA, smooth muscle actin.