Literature DB >> 23772341

Reliability of the myotonometer for assessment of posterior shoulder tightness.

Caitlyn M Kerins1, Stephanie D Moore, Timothy A Butterfield, Patrick O McKeon, Timothy L Uhl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: The Myotonometer® is an electronic tissue compliance meter that has been used to quantify the compliance of soft tissues. The Myotonometer® may be a valuable tool to measure the effectiveness of interventions commonly used to increase tissue compliance in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness (PST). Limited data exist on reliability and responsiveness of the Myotonometer® for assessment of soft tissues about the shoulder; therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the intra- and inter-session reliability and responsiveness of the Myotonometer® in measuring tissue compliance of the posterior shoulder musculature in asymptomatic subjects with PST.
METHODS: Fifteen asymptomatic subjects with unilateral shoulder range of motion deficits attended two measurement sessions to assess the compliance of the tissues overlying the posterior deltoid, infraspinatus, and teres musculature. Analyses of reliability and responsiveness were conducted using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the determination of minimal detectible change (MDC).
RESULTS: Intra-session ICC values ranged from 0.69 to 0.91 for all muscles with MDC never exceeding 1.0 mm. Inter-session ICC values were best for the posterior deltoid, which averaged 0.82, compared to the infraspinatus and the teres complex, which averaged 0.42 and 0.5 respectively. Inter-session MDC ranged from 0.55 to 1.20 mm across all muscles.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can reliably detect relatively small changes in tissue compliance within a single treatment session utilizing the Myotonometer®. The Myotonometer® can reliably detect changes between sessions for tissues overlying the posterior deltoid; however, observed change in the infraspinatus and teres musculature must be above 1 mm to achieve meaningful change and account for decreased inter-session reliability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit; responsiveness; tissue compliance

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772341      PMCID: PMC3679631     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  28 in total

Review 1.  Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness.

Authors:  D E Beaton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Mobility and stability adaptations in the shoulder of the overhead athlete: a theoretical and evidence-based perspective.

Authors:  Paul A Borsa; Kevin G Laudner; Eric L Sauers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Reliability, precision, accuracy, and validity of posterior shoulder tightness assessment in overhead athletes.

Authors:  Joseph B Myers; Sakiko Oyama; Craig A Wassinger; Robert D Ricci; John P Abt; Kevin M Conley; Scott M Lephart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Intrarater and interrater reliability of Myotonometer measurements of muscle tone in children.

Authors:  Asa Lidström; Gunnar Ahlsten; Helga Hirchfeld; Simone Norrlin
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Intra- and interrater reliabilities of the Myotonometer when assessing the spastic condition of children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Desiree D Aarrestad; Misty D Williams; Steven C Fehrer; Eugene Mikhailenok; Charles T Leonard
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Shoulder range of motion measures as risk factors for shoulder and elbow injuries in high school softball and baseball players.

Authors:  Ellen Shanley; Mitchell J Rauh; Lori A Michener; Todd S Ellenbecker; J Craig Garrison; Charles A Thigpen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity.

Authors:  Brian G Leggin; Lori A Michener; Michael A Shaffer; Susan K Brenneman; Joseph P Iannotti; Gerald R Williams
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Assessing the spastic condition of individuals with upper motoneuron involvement: validity of the myotonometer.

Authors:  C T Leonard; J U Stephens; S L Stroppel
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Relationships between posterior shoulder muscle stiffness and rotation in patients with stiff shoulder.

Authors:  Cheng-Ju Hung; Ching-Lin Hsieh; Pey-Lin Yang; Jiu-Jenq Lin
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Ankle stiffness and tissue compliance in stroke survivors: a validation of Myotonometer measurements.

Authors:  Sarah J Rydahl; Brenda J Brouwer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of acute and chronic resistance exercise on muscle stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott Justin Dankel; Brenna M Razzano
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2020-06-12

2.  A comparison of range of motion change across four posterior shoulder tightness measurements after external rotator fatigue.

Authors:  Amitabh Dashottar; Oren Costantini; John Borstad
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  Posterior shoulder tightness; an intersession reliability study of 3 clinical tests.

Authors:  Kevin Hall; Jeremy Lewis; Ann Moore; Colette Ridehalgh
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  Assessing muscle spasticity with Myotonometric and passive stretch measurements: validity of the Myotonometer.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Li; Henry Shin; Sheng Li; Ping Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: a factorial randomized trial.

Authors:  Lucas Bohlen; Jonah Schwarze; Jannik Richter; Bernadette Gietl; Christian Lazarov; Anna Kopyakova; Andreas Brandl; Tobias Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Conventional Humeral Retroversion Measurements Using Computed Tomography Slices or Ultrasound Images Are Not Correlated With the 3-Dimensional Humeral Retroversion Angle.

Authors:  Masayuki Saka; Hiroki Yamauchi; Toru Yoshioka; Hidetoshi Hamada; Kazuyoshi Gamada
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.