Literature DB >> 23772297

Intrascrotal lipoblastoma in a ten year old: case report and review of literature.

Ghassan Nakib1, Valeria Calcaterra, Luigi Avolio, Marinella Guazzotti, Ilaria Goruppi, Alessandra Viglio, Gloria Pelizzo.   

Abstract

Lipoblastoma is a rare benign soft tissue tumor encountered almost exclusively in infancy and early childhood. The location of tumors varies, but most occur in the extremities, trunk, head and neck. Less frequently, lipoblastomas have been reported in the mediastinum, the retroperitoneum and the inguinal region. Only 7 cases of lipoblastoma in the scrotum have been reported so far in the English literature, with none of the patients older than 8. We report an intrascrotal lipoblastoma in a 10 year-old boy. The differential diagnosis is discussed with reference to the literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adipose tumors.; children; intrascrotal; lipoblastoma

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772297      PMCID: PMC3682450          DOI: 10.4081/rt.2013.e11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rare Tumors        ISSN: 2036-3605


Introduction

Approximately 6% of all soft tissue neoplasms in the pediatric population are adipose tumors.[1] Of these, about two thirds are simple lipomas or variants, and up to 30% are lipoblastomas.[2] Lipoblastoma is an uncommon benign soft tissue tumor encountered almost exclusively in infancy and early childhood.[3,4] Tumors are asymptomatic, painless and are normally discovered as a mass on palpation. Although lipoblastomas can affect any part of the body, we are only aware of 7 reports of intrascrotal tumors,[1,2,5-9] all reported in patients under 8 years of age. We report the case of an intrascrotal lipoblastoma in a 10 year-old boy and discuss the differential diagnosis with reference to the literature.

Case Report

A 10 year-old boy presented at the Emergency Paediatric Surgery Department in our Institution (IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy) for a sudden swelling in the right inguinal region with the apparent characteristics of an inguinal hernia. His parents reported that the mass had appeared one day before. A solid, painless, rubbery, mobile mass was palpated at the upper pole of the right testicle, which felt normal otherwise. The left testicle was in the left hemiscrotum. No evidence of hernia was noticed bilaterally. Scrotal ultrasound showed a hyperechoic lesion measuring (2.50×1.58×0.88 cm) above the upper pole of the right testicle. Elasto-sonography detected a mainly elastic pattern. The left testicle was normal. All blood tests including tumor markers (HGC, feto-protein) were normal. The lesion was approached via a right inguinal incision. The mass was readily delivered with the right testicle from the wound incision. The fatty tumor was easily and totally dissected from the testicle and from the scrotal wall, and the testicle was fixed back in the scrotum. The macroscopic appearance was of a yellowish 5×5×1.5 cm mass, of rubbery consistency and homogeneous aspect (Figure 1A). At histology the mass was almost totally circumscribed with fibrous connective tissue of variable thickness, and composed of mature fatty tissue mixed with fibrotic septae of varying degrees of differentiation. Few focused and limited areas of myxoid aspect were observed interspersed with various lipoblastic elements. No evidence of necrosis, or mitosis was present. Unfortunately no tissue was obtained for cytogenetics tests (Figure 1B-D).
Figure 1

Macroscopic (A) and microscopic (B-D) appearance of the tumor.

Macroscopic (A) and microscopic (B-D) appearance of the tumor. The child was discharged 24 hours later. Sonographic follow up 1 year postoperatively showed a lesion free left testicle.

Discussion

Lipoblastoma is a very rare, benign fetal embryonal white fatty tumor. In 1926 Jaffe attributed the term lipoblastoma to describe an atypical lipomatous lesion that consisted of cells resembling embryonic white fat.[10,11] This term was intended to differentiate these lesions from common lipomas, which contain no lipoblasts.[12] The ability of a lipoblastoma to differentiate into a common lipoma was first describe by Van Meurs in 1947,[13] supporting the concept that lipoblastomas are the result of continued proliferation of immature fat cells and lobules in the postnatal period. Lipoblastoma occurs most commonly in infants and children, with 80–90% of cases in the published data occurring before the age of 3 years and 40% before the age of 1 year. Only rarely has the tumor been reported in older children or young adults.[14] Male predominance, equal distribution, and female predominance, have all been described for this tumor.[4,15,16] The location of lipoblastoma varies; tumors occur most often in the extremities, trunk, head and neck. Smaller numbers have been reported in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum and inguinal region. To our knowledge, only 7 cases of lipoblastoma have been reported in the scrotum (Table 1 summarizes the clinical data);[1,2,5-9] the ages of the subjects in these cases ranged from 7 months to 48 months. Our case is the first report of a patient older than 8 years with intrascrotal lipoblastoma.
Table 1

Summary of the clinical data of the 7 previously reported cases of pediatric intrascrotal lipoblastomas, including our case.

AuthorYearAgeSiteSize (cm)Tests
Arda et al.[5]199315 monthsLeft6.5×4×3Spared
Turner et al.[6]19989 monthsLeft5×2.5×1.5Spared
Chun et al.[2]200118 monthsNot described2.3×2×1.3Not described
Somers et al.[7]20047 monthsLeft14×14×8Not described
Del Sordo et al.[9]200748 monthsRight2×1.2×0.8Spared
Dy et al.[8]200748 monthsNot described3.5×2Spared
Kamal et al.[1]20114 monthsRight10×9×7Spared
Present case201210 yearsRight5×5×15Spared
Clinically, it is difficult to differentiate benign lipoblastomas from other scrotal masses such as malignant tumors. These lesions are asymptomatic and painless, and diagnosis is normally made upon the discovery of a mass on palpation. Although preoperative radiological imaging is useful to assess the extent of the disease and as an aid for planning surgical excision, its use is limited in differentiating lipomatous tumors and there are no pathognomonic findings associated with lipoblastomas.[17] Because of the limitations of radiological imaging, an accurate preoperative diagnosis of lipoblastoma is rarely made and total surgical excision should be performed. Differential diagnosis may also be difficult for the pathologist due to the close resemblance between lipoblastomas and myxoid or well-differentiated liposarcomas and hibernomas. Liposarcoma and hibernoma have nearly the same histological findings. Both have monovacuolated lipoblasts with hyperchromatic, pleomorphic nuclei and anaplasia. However, hibernoma has a gray-brown color and a lobulated structure. The fat cells are mostly multivacuolated, vacuoles are greater in number than in lipoblastomosis and cytoplasm is granular. Lipoblastomas are also lobulated; the cells show a wide spectrum of adipocytic differentiation, ranging from monovacuolated and multivacuolated lipoblasts to mature adipocyte. However, there are no atypical nuclei or abnormal mitoses. The stroma may be predominantly myxoid, contains variable numbers of stellate mesenchymal cells and has a plexiform vascular pattern.[1,7,9,18,19]

Conclusions

Recent studies have described specific chromosomal abnormalities that characterize benign vs malignant adipose tissue. Distinctive clonal karyotypic rearrangements of chromosomal region 8q11-13 are found to be diagnostic of lipoblastomas, whereas a distinctive translocation t(12;16) is observed in myxoid liposarcomas.[20] Structural rearrangements involving 11q13 have been reported for hybernoma.[21,22] To summarize, differential diagnosis depends on a combination of clinical features, histologic criteria and cytogenetics tests (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical features, histologic criteria and cytogenetics tests for differential diagnosis of the adipose tumors.

LipoblastomaLipoblastomatosisLiposarcoma (myxoid)Hibernomas (brown lipoma)Lipoma
MitosisNoNoYesNoNo
EncapsulatedYesYesNoNoYes
Nuclear atypia and abnormal mitosesNoNoYesNoNo
Recurrence rateLow (localized)Moderate (infiltration of adjacent structures) (diffuse)HighLowLow
Age80–90% <3 year. First decade of lifeInfancy and early childhood Upper and lower extremities,AdultYoung adultsAll
LocationExtremities, trunk, abdomen, head and neck, intrascrotalhead and neck, mediastinum, retroperitoneum, trunk, lung, mesentery, peritoneal cavity and intramuscular and inguinal canalsThigh, upper extremities, abdomen, chest wall, mediastinum, and retroperitoneumBack, chest, axilla, groin, or thighs, intra abdominal, retroperitonealSubcutaneous tissue or deep soft tissue any site
Chromosomal alterationRearrangement of 8q11-13Rearrangement of 8q11-1312q14.t(12;16) (q13; p11)Rearrangement of 11q1312q13-q15 13q12-q22 (ref.22)
Lipoblastomas are predominantly well-circumscribed and while no malignant degeneration has been documented, a rapid growth rate has been reported. There is general agreement on the treatment of lipoblastoma. Surgical exploration is mandatory and the modality adopted is as for malignant tumors. Complete surgical resection of lipoblastomas yields an excellent prognosis. Recurrence has been reported in 14% to 25% of cases, usually due to incomplete resection. Postoperative follow-up is important to detect relapses but there is no agreement on the appropriate length of follow-up for lipoblastomas. Kok et al.[17] recommend a minimum follow-up period of 5 years.
  20 in total

1.  Congenital lipoblastoma of the hand.

Authors:  C M Coffin; R A Williams
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

2.  Intrascrotal lipoblastoma.

Authors:  D T Turner; S M Shah; R Jones
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-01

3.  Lipoblastoma: pathophysiology and surgical management.

Authors:  A V Dilley; D L Patel; M J Hicks; M L Brandt
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 4.  Benign intrascrotal lipoblastoma in a 4-month-old infant: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Naglaa Mohamed Kamal; Riadh Jouini; Samira Yahya; Moutaz Haiba
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  The transformation of an embryonic lipoma to a common lipoma.

Authors:  D P VAN MEURS
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1947-01       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Tumor karyotype differentiates lipoblastoma from liposarcoma.

Authors:  G G Miller; N L Yanchar; J F Magee; G K Blair
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Lipoblastoma: clinical features, treatment, and outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth Y Y Kok; P U Telisinghe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Intrascrotal lipoblastoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Rachele Del Sordo; Antonio Cavaliere; Angelo Sidoni; Renato Colella; Guido Bellezza
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Lipoblastoma/lipoblastomatosis: a clinicopathologic study of 25 tumors.

Authors:  M H Collins; J Chatten
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 10.  Benign intrascrotal lipoblastoma in a child.

Authors:  Jun S Dy; Alexander Fuchs; Lane S Palmer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mesenteric lipoblastoma and cervical lipoblastomatosis: ultrasound, elastosonography, and computed tomography findings in two children.

Authors:  Raffaella Capasso; Eugenio Rossi; Luisa Castelli; Antonio Basilicata; Raffaele Zeccolini; Massimo Zeccolini; Antonio Rotondo
Journal:  Case Rep Radiol       Date:  2014-03-27

2.  Intrascrotal lipoblastoma: report of a case and the review of literature.

Authors:  Keigo Yada; Hiroki Ishibashi; Hiroki Mori; Mitsuo Shimada
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.