Literature DB >> 23771960

New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units.

I H R Hauge1, K Bredholt, H M Olerud.   

Abstract

The diagnostic reference level (DRL) has generally been defined as the 75th percentile of the distributions of mean doses observed on a sample of standard-sized patients, but for mammography, the 95th percentile has been used. In this study, the 75th and 95th percentiles are estimated for 26 full-field digital mammography units, representing six models from four manufacturers. Systematic differences between categories of manufacture/models are investigated with respect to mean glandular dose (MGD) and figure of merit (FOM), defined as signal difference to noise ratio squared divided by the MGD. The MGDs per unit range from 0.7 to 2.1 mGy, with overall 75th and 95th percentiles of 1.4 and 2.0 mGy, respectively. The different manufacture/models show differences in both dose distributions and FOMs. As national DRL, the 95th percentile is proposed to determine which units can be accepted for use. To identify the need for optimisation, it is proposed to use the 75th percentile for the different manufacture/models, along with the FOM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771960     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  T M Svahn; N Houssami; I Sechopoulos; S Mattsson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT.

Authors:  Kam L Lee; Toby Beveridge; Masoumeh Sanagou; Peter Thomas
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-02-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.