OBJECTIVE: Psychological well-being (PWB) has a significant relationship with physical and mental health. As a part of the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function, we developed self-report item banks and short forms to assess PWB. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Expert feedback and literature review informed the selection of PWB concepts and the development of item pools for positive affect, life satisfaction, and meaning and purpose. Items were tested with a community-dwelling US Internet panel sample of adults aged 18 and above (N = 552). Classical and item response theory (IRT) approaches were used to evaluate unidimensionality, fit of items to the overall measure, and calibrations of those items, including differential item function (DIF). RESULTS: IRT-calibrated item banks were produced for positive affect (34 items), life satisfaction (16 items), and meaning and purpose (18 items). Their psychometric properties were supported based on the results of factor analysis, fit statistics, and DIF evaluation. All banks measured the concepts precisely (reliability ≥0.90) for more than 98% of participants. CONCLUSION: These adult scales and item banks for PWB provide the flexibility, efficiency, and precision necessary to promote future epidemiological, observational, and intervention research on the relationship of PWB with physical and mental health.
OBJECTIVE: Psychological well-being (PWB) has a significant relationship with physical and mental health. As a part of the NIH Toolbox for the Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function, we developed self-report item banks and short forms to assess PWB. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Expert feedback and literature review informed the selection of PWB concepts and the development of item pools for positive affect, life satisfaction, and meaning and purpose. Items were tested with a community-dwelling US Internet panel sample of adults aged 18 and above (N = 552). Classical and item response theory (IRT) approaches were used to evaluate unidimensionality, fit of items to the overall measure, and calibrations of those items, including differential item function (DIF). RESULTS: IRT-calibrated item banks were produced for positive affect (34 items), life satisfaction (16 items), and meaning and purpose (18 items). Their psychometric properties were supported based on the results of factor analysis, fit statistics, and DIF evaluation. All banks measured the concepts precisely (reliability ≥0.90) for more than 98% of participants. CONCLUSION: These adult scales and item banks for PWB provide the flexibility, efficiency, and precision necessary to promote future epidemiological, observational, and intervention research on the relationship of PWB with physical and mental health.
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mary Klem; Ester Saghafi; Rebecca Abromitis; Angela Stover; Mary Amanda Dew; Paul Pilkonis Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christopher B Forrest; Katherine B Bevans; Ania Filus; Janine Devine; Brandon D Becker; Adam C Carle; Rachel E Teneralli; JeanHee Moon; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2019-10-01
Authors: Lilian Dindo; McKenzie K Roddy; Derrecka Boykin; Ken Woods; Merlyn Rodrigues; Tracey L Smith; Raquel D Gonzalez; Gala True Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2020-09-17
Authors: John M Salsman; Crystal L Park; Elizabeth A Hahn; Mallory A Snyder; Login S George; Michael F Steger; Thomas Merluzzi; David Cella Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Alex Ramsey; Patrick J Brown; Charles F Reynolds; Benoit H Mulsant; Helen Lavretsky; Steven P Roose Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: John M Salsman; Benjamin D Schalet; Crystal L Park; Login George; Michael F Steger; Elizabeth A Hahn; Mallory A Snyder; David Cella Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jessica Klusek; Roger Newman-Norlund; Amanda J Fairchild; Sarah Newman-Norlund; Sara Sayers; Jill C Stewart; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julius Fridriksson Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 4.163
Authors: N E Carlozzi; S Goodnight; K B Casaletto; A Goldsmith; R K Heaton; A W K Wong; C M Baum; R Gershon; A W Heinemann; D S Tulsky Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 2.813