Literature DB >> 23770689

A new semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction device: clinical, surgical, and audiologic outcomes in patients with congenital ear canal atresia.

Ralf Siegert1, Jan Kanderske.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with air-bone-gaps that cannot be corrected successfully by tympanoplasty or with mixed hearing loss may be treated with bone conducting hearing aids. Their disadvantages are the obvious external fixation components or the biological and psychosocial problems of open implants. We have developed a new partially implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Device (BCHD) without a percutaneous abutment and have been using them clinically for over 6 years. The principle of these BCHD is a magnetic coupling and acoustic transmission between implanted and external magnets. The goal of this study was to evaluate its clinical and audiologic results in patients with unilateral or bilateral congenital aural atresia.
METHODS: Magnets are implanted into shallow bone beds in a 1-step procedure. The skin above the magnets is slightly thinned. The external device fixed with counter magnets in a base plate. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients who have been implanted due to congenital atresia showed up for this follow-up study. The follow-up period was 19.3 ± 12.2 months, with a range of 0.2 to 46.6 months. The average age of the patients at the time of implantation was 12.4 years with a wide range from 6.0 to 50.0 years.
RESULTS: The average hearing gain was 31 ± 8 dB, and the suprathreshold word recognition tests increased by 57% ± 23%. Strength of the magnetic force that the patients had chosen themselves measured 0.9 ± 0.4 N with a range from 0.3 to 1.8 N. Skin thickness over the implants measured sonographically was 3.9 ± 0.8 mm (range, 2.5-5.6 mm). DISCUSSION: This new bone conducting hearing device only needs one operation, has a very low risk for complication, and a hearing gain similar to other bone conducting hearing aids. We have found high comfort and safety of this system and conclude that it could be a valuable alternative to other conventional or percutaneous bone conducting hearing solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770689     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828682e5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Modifications and new aspects pertaining to electronic hearing implants].

Authors:  R Siegert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [First audiological results of the concha-worn bone conduction instrument C.A.I. BC811].

Authors:  T Giere; S Busch; T Lenarz; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Semi-implantable transcutaneous bone conduction hearing devices].

Authors:  R Siegert; J Kanderske
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  M.ALSHEIKH Technique: Modification to the Soft Tissue Reduction in the Baha® Attract Surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed AlShaikh; Osama Majdalawieh; Alhussain Kullab
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-27

6.  First experience in Italy with a new transcutaneous bone conduction implant.

Authors:  P Marsella; A Scorpecci; G Dalmasso; C Pacifico
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system.

Authors:  Anja Kurz; Mark Flynn; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

Review 9.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06

10.  Surgical and Audiologic Comparison Between Sophono and Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Implantation.

Authors:  Joong-Wook Shin; Sung Huhn Kim; Jae Young Choi; Hong-Joon Park; Seung-Chul Lee; Jee-Sun Choi; Han Q Park; Ho-Ki Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.