Miriam Wanner1, Nicole Probst-Hensch2, Susi Kriemler3, Flurina Meier2, Adrian Bauman4, Brian W Martin1. 1. Physical Activity and Health Working Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Physical Activity and Health Working Unit, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-report instruments to assess physical activity are still the most feasible option in many population-wide surveys, and often need to be very short owing to resource constraints. The aim of this study was to test the criterion validity of a single-item physical activity measure using accelerometers and to compare its measurement properties by gender, age group (including older adults) and language region. METHODS: A validation study was carried out within the second follow-up of a large Swiss cohort study (Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Disease in Adults, SAPALDIA, n=208) and included an additional convenient sample (n=110). Participants wore an accelerometer over eight consecutive days and then completed the single-item measure. Spearman's rank-order correlations were used to assess the criterion validity. RESULTS: Physical activity levels were higher in men, younger individuals and those from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Correlation coefficients for the number of days with at least 30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity according to the single item and different accelerometer activity outcomes ranged from 0.40 to 0.54. Correlations were higher for women, younger individuals and participants from the French-speaking and the Italian-speaking parts. CONCLUSIONS: The single-item physical activity measure performed at least as well as other physical activity questionnaires. The differences in criterion validity between sub groups indicate that factors such as gender and age should be taken into account when developing physical activity questionnaires and in future validation studies. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Self-report instruments to assess physical activity are still the most feasible option in many population-wide surveys, and often need to be very short owing to resource constraints. The aim of this study was to test the criterion validity of a single-item physical activity measure using accelerometers and to compare its measurement properties by gender, age group (including older adults) and language region. METHODS: A validation study was carried out within the second follow-up of a large Swiss cohort study (Swiss Cohort Study on Air Pollution and Lung and Heart Disease in Adults, SAPALDIA, n=208) and included an additional convenient sample (n=110). Participants wore an accelerometer over eight consecutive days and then completed the single-item measure. Spearman's rank-order correlations were used to assess the criterion validity. RESULTS: Physical activity levels were higher in men, younger individuals and those from the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Correlation coefficients for the number of days with at least 30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity according to the single item and different accelerometer activity outcomes ranged from 0.40 to 0.54. Correlations were higher for women, younger individuals and participants from the French-speaking and the Italian-speaking parts. CONCLUSIONS: The single-item physical activity measure performed at least as well as other physical activity questionnaires. The differences in criterion validity between sub groups indicate that factors such as gender and age should be taken into account when developing physical activity questionnaires and in future validation studies. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Anna Puig-Ribera; Carlos Martín-Cantera; Elisa Puigdomenech; Jordi Real; Montserrat Romaguera; José Félix Magdalena-Belio; Jose Ignacio Recio-Rodríguez; Beatriz Rodriguez-Martin; Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa; Irene Repiso-Gento; Luis Garcia-Ortiz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Evi Dons; Thomas Götschi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Audrey de Nazelle; Esther Anaya; Ione Avila-Palencia; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michelle Laeremans; Natalie Mueller; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Elisabeth Raser; David Rojas-Rueda; Arnout Standaert; Erik Stigell; Tina Uhlmann; Regine Gerike; Luc Int Panis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pedro F Saint-Maurice; Gregory J Welk; Nicholas K Beyler; Roderick T Bartee; Kate A Heelan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.295