Literature DB >> 23770521

Gaze-centered spatial updating in delayed reaching even in the presence of landmarks.

I Schütz1, D Y P Henriques, K Fiehler.   

Abstract

Previous results suggest that the brain predominantly relies on a constantly updated gaze-centered target representation to guide reach movements when no other visual information is available. In the present study, we investigated whether the addition of reliable visual landmarks influences the use of spatial reference frames for immediate and delayed reaching. Subjects reached immediately or after a delay of 8 or 12s to remembered target locations, either with or without landmarks. After target presentation and before reaching they shifted gaze to one of five different fixation points and held their gaze at this location until the end of the reach. With landmarks present, gaze-dependent reaching errors were smaller and more precise than when reaching without landmarks. Delay influenced neither reaching errors nor variability. These findings suggest that when landmarks are available, the brain seems to still use gaze-dependent representations but combine them with gaze-independent allocentric information to guide immediate or delayed reach movements to visual targets.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770521     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Attentional load interferes with target localization across saccades.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multiple spatial representations interact to increase reach accuracy when coordinating a saccade with a reach.

Authors:  Yuriria Vazquez; Laura Federici; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  No effect of delay on the spatial representation of serial reach targets.

Authors:  Immo Schütz; Denise Y P Henriques; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Are All Spatial Reference Frames Egocentric? Reinterpreting Evidence for Allocentric, Object-Centered, or World-Centered Reference Frames.

Authors:  Flavia Filimon
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Auditory cues for somatosensory targets invoke visuomotor transformations: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Gerome A Manson; Luc Tremblay; Nicolas Lebar; John de Grosbois; Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Facilitation of allocentric coding by virtue of object-semantics.

Authors:  Harun Karimpur; Yaniv Morgenstern; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Role of Quiet Eye Timing and Location in the Basketball Three-Point Shot: A New Research Paradigm.

Authors:  Joan N Vickers; Joe Causer; Dan Vanhooren
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-30

8.  Gaze-dependent spatial updating of tactile targets in a localization task.

Authors:  Stefanie Mueller; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-10

9.  Integration of egocentric and allocentric information during memory-guided reaching to images of a natural environment.

Authors:  Katja Fiehler; Christian Wolf; Mathias Klinghammer; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Gaze-centered coding of proprioceptive reach targets after effector movement: Testing the impact of online information, time of movement, and target distance.

Authors:  Stefanie Mueller; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.