Literature DB >> 23770147

The SPARC score: a multifactorial outcome prediction model for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Manuel S Eisenberg1, Stephen A Boorjian, John C Cheville, R Houston Thompson, Prabin Thapa, Dharam Kaushik, Igor Frank.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While multiple independent clinicopathological variables are associated with the outcome of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, limited prediction tools exist to facilitate individualized risk assessment. We developed the SPARC (Survival Prediction After Radical Cystectomy) score, a prediction model for bladder cancer specific survival after radical cystectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 2,403 patients who underwent radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant therapy at our institution between 1980 and 2008 with pathological re-review of all specimens. Of these patients 1,776 with nonmetastatic urothelial carcinoma were identified for analysis. A multivariate model was developed using stepwise selection to determine variables associated with cancer specific survival. We created a scoring system based on the β coefficients of this model.
RESULTS: Median followup after radical cystectomy in patients alive at last followup was 10.5 years (IQR 7.3, 15.3), during which time 610 had died of bladder cancer. In addition to pathological tumor stage, nodal status, multifocality and lymphovascular invasion, the patient specific factors of Charlson comorbidity index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, current smoking, preoperative hydronephrosis and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with the risk of bladder cancer death. We used cumulative scores of these variables to stratify patients into risk groups with 95%, 80%, 60%, 38% and 23% 5-year cancer specific survival from the lowest to the highest risk group, respectively (p<0.0001). The concordance index of this model was 0.75.
CONCLUSIONS: We present a model to individualize the estimation of cancer specific survival after radical cystectomy. Pending external validation, these data may be used for patient counseling, specifically in regard to recommendations for adjuvant therapy and surveillance frequency, as well as for clinical trial development.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACM; BC; CCI; CIS; CSS; Charlson comorbidity index; LN; LVI; RC; all cause mortality; bladder cancer; cancer specific survival; carcinoma in situ; cystectomy; lymph node; lymphovascular invasion; mortality; nomograms; prognosis; radical cystectomy; urinary bladder neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23770147     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  The prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Ilaria Lucca; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Development and validation of surgical training tool: cystectomy assessment and surgical evaluation (CASE) for robot-assisted radical cystectomy for men.

Authors:  Ahmed A Hussein; Kevin J Sexton; Paul R May; Maxwell V Meng; Abolfazl Hosseini; Daniel D Eun; Siamak Daneshmand; Bernard H Bochner; James O Peabody; Ronney Abaza; Eila C Skinner; Richard E Hautmann; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Studying the impact of comorbidity on post radical cystectomy survival: have we come a full circle?

Authors:  Subodh K Regmi; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

4.  Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the bladder-cystectomy, cystoprostatectomy and diverticulectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Authors:  E Compérat; J R Srigley; F Brimo; B Delahunt; M Koch; A Lopez-Beltran; V Reuter; H Samaratunga; J H Shanks; T Tsuzuki; T van der Kwast; M Varma; F Webster; D Grignon
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Use of preoperative performance status and hemoglobin concentration to predict overall survival for patients aged ≥ 75 years after radical cystectomy for treatment of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takahiko Hara; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Yoriaki Kamiryo; Shigeaki Hayashida; Norio Yamamoto; Takahito Nasu; Keiji Joko; Yoshikazu Baba; Akinobu Suga; Mitsutaka Yamamoto; Akihiko Aoki; Kimio Takai; Satoru Yoshihiro; Motohiko Konishi; Sigeru Sakano; Katsuhiko Imoto; Yasuhide Tei; Shiro Yamaguchi; Seiji Yano
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Systematic Review of Comorbidity and Competing-risks Assessments for Bladder Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Ashish M Kamat; Karim Chamie; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Peter N Wiklund; Peter C Black; Gary D Steinberg; Stephen A Boorjian; Sia Daneshmand; Peter J Goebell; Kamal S Pohar; Shahrokh F Shariat; George N Thalmann
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06

Review 7.  Role of prehabilitation following major uro-oncologic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Minnella; Francesco Carli; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Prognostic implications of preoperative anemia in urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Luo; Ya-Shen Wang; Yan-Hui Su; Zhi-Hua Zhang; Hong-Hong Sun; Jian Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognostic Role of C-Reactive Protein In Urological Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liang Zhou; Xiang Cai; Qiang Liu; Zhong-Yu Jian; Hong Li; Kun-Jie Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical cystectomy on patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hwanik Kim; Myong Kim; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.