Literature DB >> 23769922

Superior liver sparing by combined coplanar/noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a planning and feasibility study.

Yi-Chun Tsai1, Chiao-Ling Tsai, Feng-Ming Hsu, Wu Jian-Kuen, Wu Chien-Jang, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng.   

Abstract

Compared with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT) and tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows additional arc configurations in treatment planning and noncoplanar (NC) delivery. This study was first to compare VMAT planning with sIMRT planning, and the second to evaluate the toxicity of coplanar (C)/NC-VMAT treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Fifteen patients with HCC (7 with left-lobe and 8 with right-lobe tumors) were planned with C-VMAT, C/NC-VMAT, and sIMRT. The median total dose was 49Gy (range: 40 to 56Gy), whereas the median fractional dose was 3.5Gy (range: 3 to 8Gy). Different doses/fractionations were converted to normalized doses of 2Gy per fraction using an α/β ratio of 2.5. The mean liver dose, volume fraction receiving more than 10Gy (V10), 20Gy (V20), 30Gy (V30), effective volume (Veff), and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) were compared. C/NC-VMAT in 6 patients was evaluated for delivery accuracy and treatment-related toxicity. Compared with sIMRT, both C-VMAT (p = 0.001) and C/NC-VMAT (p = 0.03) had significantly improved target conformity index. Compared with C-VMAT and sIMRT, C/NC-VMAT for treating left-lobe tumors provided significantly better liver sparing as evidenced by differences in mean liver dose (p = 0.03 and p = 0.007), V10 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.009), V20 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.01), V30 (p = 0.02 and p = 0.002), Veff (p = 0.006 and p = 0.001), and EUD (p = 0.04 and p = 0.003), respectively. For right-lobe tumors, there was no difference in liver sparing between C/NC-VMAT, C-VMAT, and sIMRT. In all patients, dose to more than 95% of target points met the 3%/3mm criteria. All 6 patients tolerated C/NC-VMAT and none of them had treatment-related ≥ grade 2 toxicity. The C/NC-VMAT can be used clinically for HCC and provides significantly better liver sparing in patients with left-lobe tumors.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver; Noncoplanar; Volumetric-modulated arc therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769922     DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Dosim        ISSN: 1873-4022            Impact factor:   1.482


  4 in total

1.  Off-target-isocentric approach in non-coplanar Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning for lung SBRT treatments.

Authors:  Sangroh Kim; Tzu-Chi Tseng
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: dosimetric and clinical results.

Authors:  Sun Hyun Bae; Won Il Jang; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  Stereotactic body proton therapy for liver tumors: Dosimetric advantages and their radiobiological and clinical implications.

Authors:  W Tristram Arscott; Reid F Thompson; Lingshu Yin; Brendan Burgdorf; Maura Kirk; Edgar Ben-Josef
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22

4.  Stereotactic Body radiation therapy for liver tumors with or without rotational intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Elodie Nouhaud; Gilles Créhange; Adèle Cueff; Magali Quivrin; Magali Rouffiac-Thouant; Laurent Mineur; Robin Garcia; Jérôme Chamois; Philippe Maingon
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-11-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.