Literature DB >> 23769813

The neuroscience of in-group bias.

Pascal Molenberghs1.   

Abstract

Racism and in-group favoritism is prevalent in our society and has been studied in Social Psychology for a long time. Recently it has become possible to investigate the neural mechanisms that underlie these in-group biases, and hence this review will give an overview of recent developments on the topic. Rather than relying on a single brain region or network, it seems that subtle changes in neural activation across the brain, depending on the modalities involved, underlie how we divide the world into 'us' versus 'them'. These insights have important implications for our understanding of how in-group biases develop and could potentially lead to new insights on how to reduce them.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Action perception; Empathy; Face perception; Group membership; In-group bias; Social categorization; Social neuroscience; Vicarious responses

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769813     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  28 in total

1.  Infants possess an abstract expectation of ingroup support.

Authors:  Kyong-Sun Jin; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of group membership and individual differences in psychopathy and perspective taking on neural responses when punishing and rewarding others.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Rebecca Bosworth; Zoie Nott; Winnifred R Louis; Joanne R Smith; Catherine E Amiot; Kathleen D Vohs; Jean Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict.

Authors:  Xiaochun Han; Shuai Zhou; Nardine Fahoum; Taoyu Wu; Tianyu Gao; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Michele J Gelfand; Xinhuai Wu; Shihui Han
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  Performance monitoring during a minimal group manipulation.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Marie-Theres Holzner; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The neural correlates of justified and unjustified killing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Pascal Molenberghs; Claudette Ogilvie; Winnifred R Louis; Jean Decety; Jessica Bagnall; Paul G Bain
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The effect of ethnicity and team membership on face processing: a cultural neuroscience perspective.

Authors:  Zhimin Yan; Stephanie N L Schmidt; Sebastian Saur; Peter Kirsch; Daniela Mier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Probing Prejudice with Startle Eyeblink Modification: A Marker of Attention, Emotion, or Both?

Authors:  Eric J Vanman; John P Ryan; William C Pedersen; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2013-10

8.  Perceived reputation of others modulates empathic neural responses.

Authors:  Li Zheng; Qianfeng Wang; Xuemei Cheng; Lin Li; Guang Yang; Lining Sun; Xiaoli Ling; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The mere presence of an outgroup member disrupts the brain's feedback-monitoring system.

Authors:  Nicholas M Hobson; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Source unreliability decreases but does not cancel the impact of social information on metacognitive evaluations.

Authors:  Amélie Jacquot; Terry Eskenazi; Edith Sales-Wuillemin; Benoît Montalan; Joëlle Proust; Julie Grèzes; Laurence Conty
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.