| Literature DB >> 23769662 |
Paul N Baker1, Timothy Petheram2, Daniel Dowen2, Simon S Jameson3, Peter J Avery4, Mike R Reed5, David J Deehan6.
Abstract
Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Variation in published results for patella resurfacing may potentially be explained by differences in design between TKA brands. We interrogated NJR-PROMs data to ascertain whether there is an early functional benefit to resurfacing the patella, both overall and for each of the five most popular primary knee designs through use of the Oxford Knee Score. A total of 8103 resurfaced TKAs and 15,290 nonresurfaced TKAs were studied. There was a large variation in the proportion of knees undergoing patella resurfacing by brand (Nexgen=16% versus Triathlon=52%). Patellar resurfacing did not significantly influence the magnitude of improvement in overall knee function or anterior knee-specific function irrespective of TKA brand or for cruciate retaining versus sacrificing designs.Entities:
Keywords: PROMs; patella resurfacing; total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23769662 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757