Literature DB >> 23769648

Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?

Mamas A Mamas1, Karim Ratib, Helen Routledge, Ludwig Neyses, Douglas G Fraser, Mark de Belder, Peter F Ludman, Jim Nolan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the influence of access site utilization on mortality, major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE), bleeding, and vascular complications in a large number of patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in the United Kingdom over a 5-year period, through analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy, bleeding complications remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPCI. A significant proportion of such bleeding complications are related to the access site, and adoption of radial access may reduce these complications. These benefits have not previously been studied in a large unselected national population of PPCI patients.
METHODS: Mortality (30-day), MACCE (a composite of 30-day mortality and in-hospital myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, and cerebrovascular events), and bleeding and access site complications were studied based on transfemoral access (TFA) and transradial access (TRA) site utilization in PPCI STEMI patients. The influence of access site selection was studied in 46,128 PPCI patients; TFA was used in 28,091 patients and TRA in 18,037. Data were adjusted for potential confounders using Cox regression that accounted for the propensity to undergo radial or femoral approach.
RESULTS: TRA was independently associated with a lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.97; p < 0.05), in-hospital MACCE (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.93; p < 0.05), major bleeding (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.74; p < 0.01), and access site complications (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.75; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a large number of PPCI procedures demonstrates that utilization of TRA is independently associated with major reductions in mortality, MACCE, major bleeding, and vascular complication rates.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMI; BCIS; British Cardiovascular Intervention Society; CABG; CI; GP; HR; IABP; MACCE; OR; PCI; PPCI; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI; TFA; TRA; access site; acute myocardial infarction; confidence interval; coronary artery bypass grafting; femoral; glycoprotein; hazard ratio; intra-aortic balloon pump; major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event(s); odds ratio; outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; primary percutaneous coronary intervention; radial; transfemoral access; transradial access

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769648     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  25 in total

1.  Delay in reperfusion with transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Might some delays be acceptable?

Authors:  Neil J Wimmer; David J Cohen; Jason H Wasfy; Saif S Rathore; Laura Mauri; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Michael Behnes; Melike Ünsal; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Uzair Ansari; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ursula Hoffmann; Siegfried Lang; Jürgen Kuschyk; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Transradial Sheathless Approach for PCI.

Authors:  Douglas Fraser; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Radial Versus Femoral Access for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Helen Routledge; Sanjay Sastry
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Major Bleeding and Adverse Outcome following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Eric W Holroyd; Ahmad Hs Mustafa; Chee W Khoo; Rob Butler; Douglas G Fraser; Jim Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-03

Review 6.  Transradial intervention in ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ahmad H S Mustafa; Eric Holroyd; Rob Butler; Doug Fraser; Magdi El-Omar; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Same day discharge after elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ian C Gilchrist
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  The Role of the Transradial Approach for Complex Coronary Interventions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sasko Kedev
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2013-08

Review 9.  Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Matthew S Schoenfeld; Ibrahim Kassas; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

10.  Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.

Authors:  Khalid Changal; Mubbasher Ameer Syed; Ealla Atari; Salik Nazir; Sameer Saleem; Sajjad Gul; F N U Salman; Asad Inayat; Ehab Eltahawy
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.