Literature DB >> 23769551

Benidipine has effects similar to losartan on the central blood pressure and arterial stiffness in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Sang-Hyun Ihm1, Hui-Kyung Jeon, Shung Chull Chae, Do-Sun Lim, Kee-Sik Kim, Dong-Ju Choi, Jong-Won Ha, Dong-Soo Kim, Kye Hun Kim, Myeong-Chan Cho, Sang Hong Baek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central blood pressure (BP) is pathophysiologically more important than peripheral BP for the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Arterial stiffness is also a good predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The effects of benidipine, a unique dual L-/T-type calcium channel blocker, on central BP have not been reported. This study aimed to compare the effect of benidipine and losartan on the central BP and arterial stiffness in mild to moderate essential hypertensives.
METHODS: This 24 weeks, multi-center, open label, randomized, active drug comparative, parallel group study was designed as a non-inferiority study. The eligible patients (n = 200) were randomly assigned to receive benidipine (n = 101) or losartan (n = 99). Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis were used to measure the central BP, pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx). We also measured the metabolic and inflammatory markers.
RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the central BP decreased significantly from baseline by (16.8 ± 14.0/10.5 ± 9.2) mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa) (systolic/diastolic BP; P < 0.001) in benidipine group and (18.9 ± 14.7/12.1 ± 10.2) mmHg (P < 0.001) in losartan group respectively. Both benidipine and losartan groups significantly lowered peripheral BP (P < 0.001) and AIx (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the two groups. The mean aortic, brachial and femoral PWV did not change in both groups after 24-week treatment. There were no significant changes of the blood metabolic and inflammatory biomarkers in each group.
CONCLUSION: Benidipine is as effective as losartan in lowering the central and peripheral BP, and improving arterial stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tracey J McGaughey; Emily A Fletcher; Sachin A Shah
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  The impact of angiotensin receptor blockers on arterial stiffness: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Peng; Hongming Pan; Bin Wang; Jinxiu Lin; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Kazuomi Kario; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Satoshi Hoshide; Huynh Van Minh; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Jinho Shin; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Narsingh Verma; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Must new drugs be superior to those already available? The role of noninferiority clinical trials.

Authors:  J Rick Turner; Todd A Durham
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.