Literature DB >> 23769195

Indications and outcomes of corneal transplantation in geriatric patients.

Fulya Duman1, Mustafa Kosker2, Kunal Suri2, Jagadesh C Reddy2, Jenny F Ma2, Kristin M Hammersmith2, Parveen K Nagra2, Christopher J Rapuano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the most common corneal transplant procedures, indications, coexisting ocular diseases, and outcomes in elderly patients, and to compare younger geriatric patients with super-geriatric patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Data of all patients 65 years old and older who underwent corneal transplantation at Wills Eye Institute from April 2007 to January 2013, and were followed up for at least 1 year, were collected. Two hundred seventy-one eyes of 253 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the age of the patient.
RESULTS: Group I (65-79 years old) included 181 eyes and Group II (80 years and older) included 90 eyes. The most common indication was Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, with 78 eyes (43%) in Group I and 34 eyes (38%) in Group II. In Group I, 93 Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (46%), and 4 keratoprosthesis procedures(2%) were performed; in Group II, 37 DSEK (41%), 51 PK (57%), and 2 keratoprosthesis procedures (2%) were performed. Graft survival rate at last visit was 90% for Group I and 88% for Group II. Rejection occurred in 18 Group I eyes (10%) and 7 Group II eyes (8%) (P = .562).
CONCLUSION: Endothelial abnormalities were more common indications and keratoconus was a less common indication for surgery in the elderly. Fuchs dystrophy was the leading indication for surgery in both super-geriatric and younger geriatric patients. Graft survival rate was slightly higher in the younger geriatric age group but was not statistically significant. In the elderly, there is an increased prevalence of both glaucoma and retinal diseases that can affect the visual outcomes after corneal transplantation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769195     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  11 in total

1.  Are our cornea waiting lists dynamic enough?

Authors:  Melis Palamar; Sait Egrilmez; Ayse Yagci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Commentary: A review of long-term corneal preservation techniques: Relevance and renewed interests in the COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Rinky Agarwal; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device.

Authors:  Shawn M Iverson; Oriel Spierer; George C Papachristou; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; David S Greenfield; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparative culture of human corneal endothelial cells following treatment with human platelet lysate/fibrin hydrogel versus Y-27632 ROCK inhibitor: in vitro and ex vivo study.

Authors:  Mohammad Amir Mishan; Sahar Balagholi; Tahereh Chamani; Sepehr Feizi; Zahra-Soheila Soheili; Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Considerations for Corneal Surgery With Patients in the 10th Decade of Life.

Authors:  Harry Levine; Andrea Naranjo; Jaime D Martinez; Diego S Altamirano; Steven Gayer; Terrence P O'Brien; Carol L Karp; Guillermo Amescua
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.152

6.  Long-term outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus: analysis of the factors associated with final visual acuities.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Min A Lee; Man-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 7.  Eye surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Dorota Raczyńska; Leopold Glasner; Ewelina Serkies-Minuth; Magdalena A Wujtewicz; Kamila Mitrosz
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 8.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Prafulla K Maharana; Shipra Singhi; Neelima Aron; Mukesh Patil
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Corneal transplantation: A new view of life.

Authors:  Fardin Amiri; Shahrzad Ghiyasvandian; Elham Navab; Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-04-25

10.  Comprehensive characterization of DNA methylation changes in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Emily Khuc; Russell Bainer; Marie Wolf; Selene M Clay; Daniel J Weisenberger; Jacquelyn Kemmer; Valerie M Weaver; David G Hwang; Matilda F Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.