Literature DB >> 23769015

Progesterone vaginal ring: introducing a contraceptive to meet the needs of breastfeeding women.

Saumya RamaRao1, Heather Clark, Ruth Merkatz, Heather Sussman, Régine Sitruk-Ware.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2012 London Summit on Family Planning called for innovative solutions for increasing contraceptive access for 120 million women and girls by 2020. One way of contributing to this goal is to address the contraceptive needs of postpartum women, who have considerable unmet need especially during lactation. The progesterone vaginal ring (PVR) has been shown to be effective and safe for breastfeeding women and has the potential to enhance contraceptive choice. This user-controlled method reduces dependence on health care providers and has the potential to reduce some access-related barriers that users face. Postpartum women who have used the method have found it easy to use and find it acceptable. A well-designed introductory approach is important to ensure that the PVR is integrated into health systems.
CONCLUSION: The PVR is a new technology that increases contraceptive options for breastfeeding women and has the potential to improve the health of women and their infants. Careful planning with attention paid to numerous factors can result in its successful introduction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23769015     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a novel progesterone intravaginal ring in sheep.

Authors:  Herman Weiss; Bridget Martell; Ginger D Constantine; Sarah M Davis; Justin D Vidal; Philip R Mayer; Martin Doorbar; David R Friend
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Acceptability of the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring: development of a model; implications for introduction.

Authors:  Ruth B Merkatz; Marlena Plagianos; Elena Hoskin; Michael Cooney; Paul C Hewett; Barbara S Mensch
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Association of vaginal dysbiosis and biofilm with contraceptive vaginal ring biomass in African women.

Authors:  Liselotte Hardy; Vicky Jespers; Irith De Baetselier; Jozefien Buyze; Lambert Mwambarangwe; Viateur Musengamana; Janneke van de Wijgert; Tania Crucitti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High acceptability of a contraceptive vaginal ring among women in Kigali, Rwanda.

Authors:  Evelyne Kestelyn; Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil; Marie Michelle Umulisa; Grace Umutoni; Alice Uwingabire; Lambert Mwambarangwe; Mireille Uwineza; Stephen Agaba; Tania Crucitti; Janneke van de Wijgert; Thérèse Delvaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Addressing contraceptive needs exacerbated by COVID-19: A call for increasing choice and access to self-managed methods.

Authors:  Lisa B Haddad; Saumya RamaRao; Avishek Hazra; Harriet Birungi; Jim Sailer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Husbands' concerns and experiences with the progesterone vaginal ring in three sub-Saharan African countries: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Francis Obare; Fatou Mbow; Saumya RamaRao; Avishek Hazra
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2022
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.