Literature DB >> 2376892

Length of stay in the intensive care unit. Effects of practice guidelines and feedback.

K A Eagle1, A G Mulley, S J Skates, V A Reder, B W Nicholson, J O Sexton, G O Barnett, G E Thibault.   

Abstract

We developed consensus management guidelines for patients admitted with chest pain, pulmonary edema, and syncope and used these guidelines to examine practice variation and the effects of physician feedback on decision making in 1145 consecutive admissions to three medical intensive care units. Data collection included a 6-month baseline period and two 6-month physician feedback periods. Hospital length of stay fell from 8.34 days to 7.41 and 7.14 days during feedback; intensive care unit length of stay fell from 2.45 days to 2.23 and 2.07 days. Feedback was associated with an increase in the percentage of patients conforming to the management guidelines. Multiple linear regression showed that feedback correlated with reductions of 0.79 days (confidence interval, 0.12 to 1.46) in hospital length of stay and 0.21 days (confidence interval 0.05 to 0.37) in intensive care unit length of stay. This effect was most apparent in patients not requiring any intervention, but with a major complication. During the 6-month follow-up, mortality, readmission, and urgent readmission rates were similar for patients admitted in baseline and feedback periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2376892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

1.  Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcomes in a managed care setting.

Authors:  G M Burlingame; M J Lambert; C W Reisinger; W M Neff; J Mosier
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1995

2.  Detecting acute cardiac ischemia.

Authors:  H P Selker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Predicting outcomes: routine versus special data, groups versus individuals.

Authors:  L Goldman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Implementation of a clinical practice guideline for stress ulcer prophylaxis increases appropriateness and decreases cost of care.

Authors:  S Pitimana-aree; D Forrest; G Brown; A Anis; X H Wang; P Dodek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  A S Basinski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Medical practice guidelines.

Authors:  R D Walker; M O Howard; M D Lambert; R Suchinsky
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-07

7.  Is cardiac test availability a significant factor in weekend delays in discharge for chest pain patients?

Authors:  A Sheng; A G Ellrodt; L Agocs; N Tankel; S Weingarten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The adoption of preventive care practice guidelines by primary care physicians: do actions match intentions?

Authors:  S Weingarten; E Stone; R Hayward; S Tunis; M Pelter; H Huang; R Kristopaitis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care.

Authors:  Sabine N van der Veer; Maartje L G de Vos; Kitty J Jager; Peter H J van der Voort; Niels Peek; Gert P Westert; Wilco C Graafmans; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.

Authors:  Michael P Goldman; Lindsey A Query; Ambrose H Wong; Isabel T Gross; Beth L Emerson; Marc A Auerbach; Gunjan K Tiyyagura
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.454

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.