PURPOSE: There are no reports of systematically-measured penile dimensions in boys with varying extents of hypospadias. To determine reference values, we prospectively measured maximum glans width in patients undergoing distal and proximal hypospadias repair as well as newborns undergoing elective circumcision. METHODS: The maximum glans diameter was measured in consecutive boys aged 0-24 months presenting for newborn circumcision (controls), or repair of distal (distal shaft or glanular) and proximal (proximal shaft to perineal) hypospadias. Patients with proximal hypospadias and glans diameter <14 mm received intramuscular testosterone 2 mg/kg injection once monthly for 2-3 treatments, with measurements recorded prior to the first injection, and again intra-operatively 3-4 weeks after the final injection. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 240 controls, 188 boys with distal hypospadias, and 39 boys with proximal hypospadias. Median ages were 1, 9 and 9 months, respectively. Males undergoing newborn circumcision were younger than both cohorts of hypospadias patients (p < 0.0001), but no difference in age was noted in those with distal and proximal hypospadias (p = 0.194). Average maximum glans diameters were significantly different: 14.3, 14.8, and 12.9 mm, respectively, for controls, distal and proximal hypospadias (p < 0.0001). Despite mean older age, 46 (24.5%) boys with distal hypospadias and 24 (61.5%) with proximal hypospadias had small glans diameter <14 mm. Increasing age was not correlated with increasing glans size in patients with distal or proximal hypospadias (r = -0.136, p = 0.062 and r = -0.089, p = 0.580) at 3-24 months of age. CONCLUSION: Some boys with distal and the majority of those with proximal hypospadias have a glans width less than that of the average normal newborn. Glans size does not correlate with age in patients with hypospadias between 3 and 24 months old, supporting the decision to operate as early as 3 months in some centers.
PURPOSE: There are no reports of systematically-measured penile dimensions in boys with varying extents of hypospadias. To determine reference values, we prospectively measured maximum glans width in patients undergoing distal and proximal hypospadias repair as well as newborns undergoing elective circumcision. METHODS: The maximum glans diameter was measured in consecutive boys aged 0-24 months presenting for newborn circumcision (controls), or repair of distal (distal shaft or glanular) and proximal (proximal shaft to perineal) hypospadias. Patients with proximal hypospadias and glans diameter <14 mm received intramuscular testosterone 2 mg/kg injection once monthly for 2-3 treatments, with measurements recorded prior to the first injection, and again intra-operatively 3-4 weeks after the final injection. RESULTS: Data were obtained in 240 controls, 188 boys with distal hypospadias, and 39 boys with proximal hypospadias. Median ages were 1, 9 and 9 months, respectively. Males undergoing newborn circumcision were younger than both cohorts of hypospadiaspatients (p < 0.0001), but no difference in age was noted in those with distal and proximal hypospadias (p = 0.194). Average maximum glans diameters were significantly different: 14.3, 14.8, and 12.9 mm, respectively, for controls, distal and proximal hypospadias (p < 0.0001). Despite mean older age, 46 (24.5%) boys with distal hypospadias and 24 (61.5%) with proximal hypospadias had small glans diameter <14 mm. Increasing age was not correlated with increasing glans size in patients with distal or proximal hypospadias (r = -0.136, p = 0.062 and r = -0.089, p = 0.580) at 3-24 months of age. CONCLUSION: Some boys with distal and the majority of those with proximal hypospadias have a glans width less than that of the average normal newborn. Glans size does not correlate with age in patients with hypospadias between 3 and 24 months old, supporting the decision to operate as early as 3 months in some centers.