Literature DB >> 23768786

Pharmaceuticals and organic pollution mitigation in reclamation osmosis brines by UV/H2O2 and ozone.

A Justo1, O González, J Aceña, S Pérez, D Barceló, C Sans, S Esplugas.   

Abstract

One significant disadvantage of using reverse osmosis (RO) for reclamation purposes is the need to dispose of the RO retentates. These retentates contain a high concentration of micropollutants, effluent organic matter (EfOM) and other inorganic constituents, which are recalcitrant to biological treatment and may impact the environment. The occurrence of 11 pharmaceuticals (concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 1.6 μg L(-1)) and their mitigation in RO retentates by a UV/H2O2 process and ozonation was studied using a wide range of oxidant dosages. Eleven pharmaceuticals were identified at. Initial observed kinetic constants (kobs) were calculated for the different pharmaceuticals. Other typical wastewater parameters were also monitored during the UV/H2O2 and ozonation reactions. The range for kobs was found to be 0.8-12.8L mmol O3(-1) and 9.7-29.9 L mmol H2O2(-1) for the ozonation and UV/H2O2 process, respectively. For ozonation, Atenolol, Carbamazepine, Codeine, Trimethoprim and Diclofenac showed the lowest initial kobs (in the order mentioned). Atenolol and Carbamazepine appeared as the most ozone resistant pharmaceuticals, exhibiting the lowest percentage of elimination at low ozone doses. On the other hand, despite the non-selectivity of HO, differences in the initial kobs were also observed during the UV/H2O2 process. Trimethoprim, Paroxetine and Sulfamethoxazole exhibited the lowest initial kobs values (in the order mentioned). Trimethoprim and Paroxetine also exhibited the lowest percentage removal when low H2O2 doses were assayed. The compounds that were identified as problematic during ozonation were more efficiently removed by the UV/H2O2 process. UV/H2O2 generally appeared to be a more efficient technology for removing pharmaceuticals from RO brines compared to ozonation.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AOP; Micropollutants; RO concentrate; Retentates

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23768786     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  5 in total

1.  Application of solar photo-Fenton at circumneutral pH to nanofiltration concentrates for removal of pharmaceuticals in MWTP effluents.

Authors:  S Miralles-Cuevas; I Oller; J A Sánchez Pérez; S Malato
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Evaluation of the treatment of reverse osmosis concentrates from municipal wastewater reclamation by coagulation and granular activated carbon adsorption.

Authors:  Ying-Xue Sun; Zhe Yang; Tao Ye; Na Shi; Yuan Tian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Removal of Sulfamethoxazole, Sulfathiazole and Sulfamethazine in their Mixed Solution by UV/H2O2 Process.

Authors:  Guangcan Zhu; Qi Sun; Chuya Wang; Zhonglian Yang; Qi Xue
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Carbamazepine and Diclofenac Removal Double Treatment: Oxidation and Adsorption.

Authors:  Alejandro Aldeguer Esquerdo; Pedro José Varo Galvañ; Irene Sentana Gadea; Daniel Prats Rico
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Impact of Pre-Ozonation during Nanofiltration of MBR Effluent.

Authors:  Zoulkifli Amadou-Yacouba; Julie Mendret; Geoffroy Lesage; François Zaviska; Stephan Brosillon
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.