Literature DB >> 2376864

Quantitative evaluation of hemiparesis with corticomyographic motor evoked potential recorded by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

J Xing1, Y Katayama, T Yamamoto, T Hirayama, T Tsubokawa.   

Abstract

Corticomyographic motor evoked potentials (MEP) activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex provide clinicians with an opportunity to evaluate corticospinal motor systems quantitatively and noninvasively. Threshold, amplitude, and latency of the corticomyographic MEP, however, are variable between subjects mainly because current directions and intensities induced by magnetic stimulation cannot be determined precisely due to anatomical variations of subjects. The variability of corticomyographic MEPs has limited the use of corticomyographic MEP for evaluating mild changes in corticospinal motor function. In the present study, we used an internal standard to assess hemiplegia, expressing relative amplitude, latency, and threshold of responses on the paretic side as a function of responses elicited from the intact side (%MEP). Neurological function of paretic muscles, as determined by a muscle maneuver test (MMT), clearly correlated to %MEP threshold, amplitude, and latency. Since corticomyographic MEP are similar when recorded from symmetrical sites on two extremities of normal subjects, %MEP provided a sensitive measure of mild hemiparesis. The %MEP approach revealed abnormal MMT scores of 3 or 4 more frequently than did standard MEP approaches. %MEP amplitude was more sensitive to mild hemiparesis than %MEP latency or %MEP threshold. Since magnetic stimulation with a safe intensity range cannot reliably produce corticomyographic MEP in severely paretic muscles with MMT scores of 2 or less, the MEP appears to be most useful for evaluating mild hemiparesis. This technique should expand significantly the clinical usefulness of corticomyographic MEP in neurosurgical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2376864     DOI: 10.1089/neu.1990.7.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  3 in total

1.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates.

Authors:  Sein Schmidt; Rouven Bathe-Peters; Robert Fleischmann; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Transplantation of rat cranial bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional recovery in rats with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yuyo Maeda; Takashi Otsuka; Masaaki Takeda; Takahito Okazaki; Kiyoharu Shimizu; Masashi Kuwabara; Masahiro Hosogai; Louis Yuge; Takafumi Mitsuhara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Longitudinal electrophysiological changes after mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in a spinal cord injury rat model.

Authors:  Yuyo Maeda; Masaaki Takeda; Takafumi Mitsuhara; Takahito Okazaki; Kiyoharu Shimizu; Masashi Kuwabara; Masahiro Hosogai; Louis Yuge; Nobutaka Horie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.