Literature DB >> 23768527

A biological walker is faster and better recognized when aligned with body axis observer.

Guillaume Barbieri1, Florent Fouque, Thierry Pozzo, Dominic Pérennou.   

Abstract

The representation of the vertical direction is a compromise between the directions given by the egocentric and allocentric references. Dissociations between these two referentials in the discrimination of a biological walker which typically refers to a model of verticality questions the coordinate system (allocentric and/or egocentric) used to perceive it. With a point-light display paradigm, the characteristics of an artificial walking pattern were manipulated in order to offer to 10 healthy participants (5 men/5 women; 24.6±3.4 years) a female or male locomotion which had to be identified as such. The body position of the viewer (sitting/lying) and the walking pattern viewed (aligned/rotated in relation to the egocentric referential) were crossed. Three indices were analyzed and 200 trials recorded: percentage of correct identification, reaction time and confidence score. This paper confirms the validity of the walking pattern model since the more pronounced the gradient of the walking pattern (as female or male) the better the recognition. Furthermore, whatever the body position, artificial walking patterns were more easily identified when they were aligned with the egocentric referential rather than tilted. The participant gender had no influence on the walking pattern recognition. We conclude that the perception of a biological walker referenced to the vertical is exclusively improved by a representation of the spatial information in an egocentric coordinate system.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender recognition; Longitudinal body axis; Point-light display; Verticality; Walking simulation model

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23768527     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  1 in total

1.  Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

Authors:  A Drakul; C J Bockisch; A A Tarnutzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.