Literature DB >> 23767441

The indirect psychological costs of cognitive enhancement.

Nadira Faulmüller1, Hannah Maslen, Filippo Santoni de Sio.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23767441     DOI： 10.1080/15265161.2013.794880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN： 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Pills or Push-Ups? Effectiveness and Public Perception of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.

Authors:  Lucius Caviola; Nadira S Faber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-02

Review 2.  Attitudes toward pharmacological cognitive enhancement-a review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Schelle; Nadira Faulmüller; Lucius Caviola; Miles Hewstone
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17

3.  Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Lucius Caviola; Adriano Mannino; Julian Savulescu; Nadira Faulmüller
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-15

4.  Why is Cognitive Enhancement Deemed Unacceptable? The Role of Fairness, Deservingness, and Hollow Achievements.

Authors:  Nadira S Faber; Julian Savulescu; Thomas Douglas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-19

5.  Sleep Deprivation Impairs and Caffeine Enhances My Performance, but Not Always Our Performance.

Authors:  Nadira S Faber; Jan A Häusser; Norbert L Kerr
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-06-23

6.  Pharmacological cognitive enhancement-how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate.

Authors:  Hannah Maslen; Nadira Faulmüller; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-11

7.  How cognitive enhancement can change our duties.

Authors:  Filippo Santoni de Sio; Nadira Faulmüller; Nicole A Vincent
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  The Complexity of Neuroenhancement and the Adoption of a Social Cognitive Perspective.

Authors:  Arnaldo Zelli; Fabio Lucidi; Luca Mallia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-01

9.  Swiss University Students' Attitudes toward Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement.

Authors:  Larissa J Maier; Evangelia Liakoni; Jan Schildmann; Michael P Schaub; Matthias E Liechti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Towards a Moral Ecology of Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in British Universities.

Authors:  Meghana Kasturi Vagwala; Aude Bicquelet; Gabija Didziokaite; Ross Coomber; Oonagh Corrigan; Ilina Singh
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.480
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.