Literature DB >> 23767439

How research on stakeholder perspectives can inform policy on cognitive enhancement.

Cynthia Forlini1, Eric Racine, Jochen Vollmann, Jan Schildmann.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23767439     DOI： 10.1080/15265161.2013.794882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN： 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Why is Cognitive Enhancement Deemed Unacceptable? The Role of Fairness, Deservingness, and Hollow Achievements.

Authors:  Nadira S Faber; Julian Savulescu; Thomas Douglas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-19

2.  Toward an Improved Multi-Criteria Drug Harm Assessment Process and Evidence-Based Drug Policies.

Authors:  Veljko Dubljević
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Pragmatic Neuroethics: Lived Experiences as a Source of Moral Knowledge.

Authors:  Gabriela Pavarini; Ilina Singh
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Toward a rational and ethical sociotechnical system of autonomous vehicles: A novel application of multi-criteria decision analysis.

Authors:  Veljko Dubljevic; George List; Jovan Milojevich; Nirav Ajmeri; William A Bauer; Munindar P Singh; Eleni Bardaka; Thomas A Birkland; Charles H W Edwards; Roger C Mayer; Ioan Muntean; Thomas M Powers; Hesham A Rakha; Vance A Ricks; M Shoaib Samandar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.