Literature DB >> 23767199

Incidence of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea in a tertiary care hospital.

Mala V Kaneria1, Sonia Paul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rampant and injudicious use of broad spectrum antibiotics in hospitalized patients has increased the incidence of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD). Though antibiotic use is the best known risk factor for CDAD, the occurrence of community acquired C. difficile suggests the presence of other risk factors too. However CDAD is still under-recognized in India and Asia. Therefore we undertook a prospective study to determine the incidence of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea in our hospital.
METHODS: 50 patients of antibiotic associated diarrhoea (AAD) and 50 age and sex matched controls were studied prospectively over a period of 1 year. Controls were patients on antibiotics who did not have diarrhoea. All other causes of diarrhoea were ruled out. Fresh stool samples were examined for the presence of C. difficile toxin A and B by the enzyme-linked immunofluorescence assay.
RESULTS: 5 patients in the AAD group (10%) and 3 patients in the control group (6%) were positive for C. difficile toxin A and B. 5 (10%) patients in the control group showed equivocal results. Out of the 5 CDAD patients, 4 (80%) were males and 1 was a female (p = 2, not significant). 3 patients were from the MICU and 2 were from the medical wards. The median age of the patients was 39 years. Only 1 male patient was > 60 years old (p = 0.781, not significant). All 5 CDAD patients were on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and 2 had Ryle's tube inserted (p = 0.22, not significant). Only 2 patients had leucocytosis (p = 1.67, not significant) and none showed faecal leucocytosis. So out of 100 patients on antibiotics, 8 (8%) tested positive for C. difficile toxins in their stools. However, only 5 (5%) had diarrhoea (CDAD) whereas 3 (3%) were asymptomatic carriers. INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CDAD in our hospital was 10% of the 50 patients with AAD. The asymptomatic carriage rate was 6%. All the cases had mild to moderate diarrhoea and were responsive to metronidazole unlike the west where the incidence is higher and the disease more severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23767199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Physicians India        ISSN: 0004-5772


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile infection: Updates in management.

Authors:  Raseen Tariq; Sahil Khanna
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 2.  The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact.

Authors:  Nienke Z Borren; Shadi Ghadermarzi; Susan Hutfless; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates from clinically significant diarrhoea in patients from a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Meenakshi Singh; Chetana Vaishnavi; Rakesh Kochhar; Safrun Mahmood
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Systematic Literature Review on Burden of Clostridioides difficile Infection in India.

Authors:  Canna J Ghia; Shaumil Waghela; Gautam S Rambhad
Journal:  Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-05-31

5.  Nagging Presence of Clostridium difficile Associated Diarrhoea in North India.

Authors:  Rama Chaudhry; Nidhi Sharma; Nitin Gupta; Kamla Kant; Tej Bahadur; Trupti M Shende; Lalit Kumar; Sushil K Kabra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

6.  Use of culture- and ELISA-based toxin assay for detecting Clostridium Difficile, a neglected pathogen: A single-center study from a tertiary care setting.

Authors:  Sujata Lall; Gita Nataraj; Preeti Mehta
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.