| Literature DB >> 23766956 |
David Klar1, Svetlana Klyatskaya, Andrea Candini, Bernhard Krumme, Kurt Kummer, Philippe Ohresser, Valdis Corradini, Valentina de Renzi, Roberto Biagi, Loic Joly, Jean-Paul Kappler, Umberto Del Pennino, Marco Affronte, Heiko Wende, Mario Ruben.
Abstract
The magnetic and electronic properties of single-molecule magnets are studied by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism. We study the magnetic coupling of ultrathin Co and Ni films that are epitaxially grown onto a Cu(100) substrate, to an in situ deposited submonolayer of TbPc2 molecules. Because of the element specificity of the X-ray absorption spectroscopy we are able to individually determine the field dependence of the magnetization of the Tb ions and the Ni or Co film. On both substrates the TbPc2 molecules couple antiferromagnetically to the ferromagnetic films, which is possibly due to a superexchange interaction via the phthalocyanine ligand that contacts the magnetic surface.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray absorption spectroscopy; magnetic anisotropy; magnetic coupling; single molecule magnets
Year: 2013 PMID: 23766956 PMCID: PMC3678430 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.4.36
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.649
Figure 1(a) The TbPc2 molecule, consisting of two parallel phthalocyanine planes with the Tb ion centred in between and (b) a schematic illustration of the sample studied.
Figure 2X-ray absorption spectra of the Tb M4,5 edges for a submonolayer TbPc2/Cu(100), measured at T ≥ 10 K and B = 6 T. The top shows the spectra for circularly polarized X-rays (black and red) and the µ+ − µ− = XMCD signal (blue) at perpendicular photon incidence (0°). The bottom figure shows the linearly polarized absorption spectra for an incidence angle of 45°. The red line corresponds to vertical polarization, where the electric field vector is parallel to the sample plane. The black line corresponds to horizontal polarization with an angle of 45° between the electric field vector and the sample surface. The blue line is the difference, i.e., the µV − µH = XLD signal.
Figure 3Element-specific field-dependent magnetization for the sample TbPc2/Ni/Cu(100). The blue line is the magnetization curve at the maximum XMCD intensity of the Ni L3 edge (852.5 eV), the black line is at the Tb M5 edge (1235.4 eV). The top figure shows the curves from −1 T to 1 T and the bottom figure presents a zoom between −0.04 T and 0.04 T. The measurements were performed at T = 8 K under normal X-ray incidence (0°).
Figure 4Magnetization curves for the sample TbPc2/Ni/Cu(100). The top figure shows the magnetization curve at the maximum of the M5 edge of Tb (1235.4 eV) from −6 T to 6 T. In the bottom figure one can see the magnetization curve at the maximum of the L3 edge of the Co XMCD signal (778 eV) (red line) and the Tb M5 curve after subtraction of a linear signal (black curve). The measurements were performed at perpendicular X-ray incidence at T ≥ 10 K.