| Literature DB >> 23766704 |
Yanhong Li1, Huimei Wang, Wenjie Wang, Lei Yang, Yuangang Zu.
Abstract
Limited data are available on the ectomycorrhizae-induced changes in surface structure and compoEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23766704 PMCID: PMC3676916 DOI: 10.1155/2013/698752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 5Infrared spectrum results after fungus extract addition. The labels are the same as those for Figure 4.
Figure 1Particle diameter changes in soil colloids with and without fungus extract addition.
Figure 2Atomic force microscopy images of soil colloids with (b, d, and f) and without (a, c, and e) fungus extract addition. (a) Colloids from the surface layer of dark brown forest soil; (b) colloids from the surface layer of dark brown forest soil + fungus extract; (c) colloids from the deep layer of dark brown forest soil; (d) colloids from the deep layer of dark brown forest soil + fungus extract; (e) colloids from saline-alkali soil; (f) colloids from saline-alkali soil + fungus extract.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images of soil colloids with (b, d, and f) and without (a, c, and e) fungus extract addition. The labels are the same as those for Figure 2.
Figure 4X-ray powder diffraction results with and without fungus extract addition. (a) Colloids from the surface layer of dark brown forest soil; (b) colloids from the deep layer of dark brown forest soil; (c) colloids from saline-alkali soil.
Figure 6X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results with and without fungus extract addition. The labels are the same as those for Figure 4.
Results from X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the variation in element ratios with and without the addition of the fungus extract.
| Dark brown forest soil—surface | Dark brown forest soil—deep | Saline-alkali soil | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Addition of the fungus extract | Variation% | Control | Addition of the fungus extract | Variation% | Control | Addition of the fungus extract | Variation% | |
| C : O | 0.16 | 0.18 | 9.58 | 0.25 | 0.24 | −3.95 | 0.31 | 0.23 | −25.68 |
| C : N | 7.30 | 8.10 | 10.96 | 6.30 | 6.50 | 3.17 | 12.00 | 8.80 | −26.67 |
| C : Si | 0.57 | 0.62 | 8.77 | 0.90 | 0.84 | −6.67 | 1.03 | 0.77 | −25.24 |
| Si : Ca | 13.60 | 13.60 | 0.00 | 17.90 | 20.50 | 14.53 | 6.10 | 7.10 | 16.39 |
| C : Ca | 7.70 | 8.40 | 9.09 | 16.20 | 17.10 | 5.56 | 6.30 | 5.50 | −12.70 |
Figure 7ECM infection influences on plant growth and biomass N, P absorption [39]. The ECM is the same species, Gomphidius viscidus, used in this study, and plant species are Larix kaempferi, Pinus tabulaeformis, and Quercus liaotungensis. The percentage in y-axis is the improvement of each parameter relative to the untreated control (without ECM infection).