| Literature DB >> 23766703 |
Jamilah Syafawati Yaacob1, Rosna Mat Taha, Arash Khorasani Esmaeili.
Abstract
The present study deals with the cytological investigations on the meristematic root cells of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus Linn.) grown in vivo and in vitro. Cellular parameters including the mitotic index (MI), chromosome count, ploidy level (nuclear DNA content), mean cell and nuclear areas, and cell doubling time (Cdt) were determined from the 2 mm root tip segments of this species. The MI value decreased when cells were transferred from in vivo to in vitro conditions, perhaps due to early adaptations of the cells to the in vitro environment. The mean chromosome number was generally stable (2n = 2x = 30) throughout the 6-month culture period, indicating no occurrence of early somaclonal variation. Following the transfer to the in vitro environment, a significant increase was recorded for mean cell and nuclear areas, from 26.59 ± 0.09 μm² to 35.66 ± 0.10 μm² and 142.90 ± 0.59 μm² to 165.05 ± 0.58 μm², respectively. However, the mean cell and nuclear areas of in vitro grown D. caryophyllus were unstable and fluctuated throughout the tissue culture period, possibly due to organogenesis or rhizogenesis. Ploidy level analysis revealed that D. caryophyllus root cells contained high percentage of polyploid cells when grown in vivo and maintained high throughout the 6-month culture period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23766703 PMCID: PMC3674743 DOI: 10.1155/2013/686752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Relationship between percentage of metaphase frequency and duration of exposure to 0.025% colchicine for meristematic cells of Dianthus caryophyllus roots grown (a) in vivo and (b) on an MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mg L−1 NAA.
Callus induction and rhizogenesis from root explants of Dianthus caryophyllus cultured on an MS medium supplemented with various hormones after 6 months of culture.
| MS media + hormone (mg L−1) | Rhizogenesis | Callus formation (%) | Colour of callus | Observations | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAA | BAP | % | Mode | |||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | NR | NR | NR | N/A | Necrotic |
|
| ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.0 | 57.50f | Indirect | 20.00a | White | Friable callus |
|
| ||||||
| 1.0 | 0.0 | 100.00g | Indirect | 100.00m | White | Friable callus |
|
| ||||||
| 1.5 | 0.0 | 100.00g | Indirect | 90.00l | White | Friable callus |
|
| ||||||
| 2.0 | 0.0 | 100.00g | Indirect | 100.00m | White | Friable callus |
|
| ||||||
| 0.0 | 0.5 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 6 weeks |
| 1.0 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 6 weeks | |
| 1.5 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 6 weeks | |
| 2.0 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 6 weeks | |
|
| ||||||
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.00a | Indirect | 35.00d | White | Friable callus with roots |
| 1.0 | NR | N/A | 43.00e | White | Friable callus with roots | |
| 1.5 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 7 weeks | |
| 2.0 | NR | N/A | 25.00b | White | Friable callus with roots | |
|
| ||||||
| 1.0 | 0.5 | 10.00b | Indirect | 55.00g | White | Friable callus with roots |
| 1.0 | NR | N/A | 82.00j | White | Friable callus with roots | |
| 1.5 | NR | N/A | 20.00a | White | Friable callus with roots | |
| 2.0 | NR | N/A | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 5 weeks | |
|
| ||||||
| 1.5 | 0.5 | NR | N/A | 100.00m | White and green | Friable callus |
| 1.0 | NR | N/A | 75.00h | White and green | Friable callus | |
| 1.5 | NR | N/A | 80.00i | White and green | Friable callus | |
| 2.0 | 45.00e | Indirect | 30.00c | White | Friable callus with roots | |
|
| ||||||
| 2.0 | 0.5 | NR | N/A | 75.00h | White and green | Friable callus |
| 1.0 | 30.00d | Indirect | 85.00k | White | Friable callus with roots | |
| 1.5 | NR | N/A | 50.00f | Green | Compact callus | |
| 2.0 | NR | N/A | 30.00c | White and green | Friable callus | |
|
| ||||||
| 3.0 | 1.0 | 10.00b | Direct | NR | N/A | Necrotic after 6 weeks |
| 3.0 | 25.00c | Direct | 30.00c | N/A | Friable callus with roots | |
*Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test.
(NR: no response, N/A: not available).
Comparison between mitotic index (MI) of in vivo and in vitro grown Dianthus caryophyllus root meristems.
|
| MS media + hormone | Age | Mitotic index, MI |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| — | 4-day-old | 43.51 ± 2.14f |
|
| |||
|
| 2 mg L−1 NAA | 1-day-old | 41.20 ± 0.79e |
| 2-day-old | 40.23 ± 1.30de | ||
| 3-day-old | 37.35 ± 0.40c | ||
| 4-day-old | 32.32 ± 1.55a | ||
| 1-week-old | 39.20 ± 1.54cd | ||
| 2-week-old | 38.67 ± 1.35cd | ||
| 3-week-old | 43.77 ± 2.33f | ||
| 4-week-old | 38.62 ± 1.75cd | ||
| 5-week-old | 38.20 ± 3.24c | ||
| 6-week-old | 37.31 ± 1.27c | ||
| 7-week-old | 37.69 ± 0.66c | ||
| 8-week-old | 38.29 ± 1.87c | ||
| 3-month-old | 31.83 ± 0.81a | ||
| 4-month-old | 34.45 ± 0.70b | ||
| 6-month-old | 33.17 ± 0.78ab | ||
*Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test.
Comparison between chromosome numbers of in vivo and in vitro grown Dianthus caryophyllus root meristems.
|
| MS media + hormone (mg L−1) | Age | Chromosome number (mean) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| — | 4-day-old | 29.73 ± 0.12a |
|
| |||
|
| 2 mg L−1 NAA | 1-day-old | 29.40 ± 0.31a |
| 2-day-old | 28.87 ± 0.29a | ||
| 3-day-old | 29.67 ± 0.16a | ||
| 4-day-old | 29.00 ± 0.48a | ||
| 1-week-old | 29.47 ± 0.40a | ||
| 2-week-old | 29.87 ± 0.24a | ||
| 3-week-old | 29.93 ± 0.42a | ||
| 4-week-old | 29.53 ± 0.51a | ||
| 5-week-old | 28.80 ± 0.39a | ||
| 6-week-old | 28.73 ± 0.44a | ||
| 7-week-old | 28.67 ± 0.36a | ||
| 8-week-old | 27.93 ± 0.43a | ||
| 3-month-old | 28.27 ± 0.60a | ||
| 4-month-old | 28.31 ± 0.69a | ||
| 6-month-old | 29.00 ± 0.60a | ||
*Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test.
Figure 2Squashed preparation of in vitro grown Dianthus caryophyllus root tip meristem; showing 30 chromosomes in a cell ((a) 1-week-old, (b) 3-month-old, and (c) 6-month-old). Arrow shows the stained chromosomes in D. caryophyllus meristematic cell.
Comparison between mean nuclear and cell areas of in vivo and in vitro grown Dianthus caryophyllus root meristems.
|
| MS media + hormone (mg L−1) | Age | Mean nuclear area, | Mean cell area, | Ratio (N/C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| — | 4-day-old | 26.59 ± 0.09bcd | 142.90 ± 0.59def | 0.19a |
|
| |||||
|
| 2 mg L−1 NAA | 1-day-old | 35.66 ± 0.10efgh | 165.05 ± 0.58g | 0.22ab |
| 2-day-old | 30.34 ± 0.09bcdef | 124.73 ± 0.44c | 0.24abc | ||
| 3-day-old | 42.37 ± 0.12hi | 153.06 ± 0.48fg | 0.28cd | ||
| 4-day-old | 32.30 ± 0.08cdefg | 118.94 ± 0.04bc | 0.27bcd | ||
| 1-week-old | 43.95 ± 0.28i | 181.48 ± 0.49h | 0.24abc | ||
| 2-week-old | 29.64 ± 0.11bcde | 145.58 ± 0.56ef | 0.20a | ||
| 3-week-old | 17.66 ± 0.06a | 83.27 ± 0.31a | 0.21a | ||
| 4-week-old | 33.03 ± 0.10defg | 106.57 ± 0.30b | 0.31d | ||
| 5-week-old | 30.48 ± 0.11bcdef | 129.92 ± 0.54cd | 0.23abc | ||
| 6-week-old | 25.95 ± 0.09bc | 131.28 ± 0.56cde | 0.20a | ||
| 7-week-old | 38.21 ± 0.12ghi | 142.23 ± 0.59def | 0.27bcd | ||
| 8-week-old | 30.23 ± 0.10bcdef | 143.38 ± 0.54def | 0.21a | ||
| 3-month-old | 36.50 ± 0.12efgh | 157.14 ± 0.60fg | 0.23abc | ||
| 4-month-old | 36.88 ± 0.12fgh | 153.14 ± 0.61fg | 0.24abc | ||
| 6-month-old | 24.53 ± 0.09b | 105.27 ± 0.44b | 0.23abc | ||
*Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05 by one way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test.
Comparison of percentage of nuclei in various cell cycle phases between in vivo and in vitro grown Dianthus caryophyllus root meristems.
|
| MS media + hormone (mg L−1) | Age | Cell cycle phase (%) | Polyploidy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | S | G2 | ||||
|
| — | 4-day-old | — | 1.32a | 3.95a | 94.74ij |
|
| ||||||
|
| 2 mg L−1 NAA | 1-day-old | — | — | — | 100.00j |
| 2-day-old | — | 11.32f | 27.04g | 61.64bc | ||
| 3-day-old | — | 0.67a | 36.00h | 63.33bcd | ||
| 4-day-old | — | 3.27bc | 9.15b | 87.58ghi | ||
| 1-week-old | — | 2.01ab | 22.82f | 75.17ef | ||
| 2-week-old | 1.30b | 17.63i | 20.78de | 60.39b | ||
| 3-week-old | — | 11.04f | 21.43ef | 67.53bcde | ||
| 4-week-old | — | 1.42a | 3.55a | 95.04ij | ||
| 5-week-old | — | 9.09e | 19.58d | 71.33de | ||
| 6-week-old | 1.32b | 3.97c | 9.27b | 85.43gh | ||
| 7-week-old | 0.67a | 12.67g | 20.67de | 66.00bcde | ||
| 8-week-old | — | 14.00h | 43.33i | 42.67a | ||
| 3-month-old | — | 6.08d | 13.51c | 80.41fg | ||
| 4-month-old | 0.68a | 0.68a | 4.73a | 93.92hij | ||
| 6-month-old | — | 18.75i | 10.42b | 70.83cde | ||
*Means with different letters in the same column differ significantly at P < 0.05 by one way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test.
(—: absent/no data observed).