Literature DB >> 23766639

The correlation between emotional distress and aging males' symptoms at a psychiatric outpatient clinic: sexual dysfunction as a distinguishing characteristic between andropause and anxiety/depression in aging men.

Ching-Yen Chen1, Chin-Pang Lee, Yu Chen, Jun-Ran Jiang, Chun-Lin Chu, Chun-Liang Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Andropause and psychiatric disorders are associated with various symptoms in aging males and are part of the differential diagnosis of depression and anxiety. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between symptoms of aging, anxiety, and depression, and to determine if sexual dysfunction could be a differentiating characteristic in the psychiatric outpatient clinic.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-six male psychiatric outpatients participated in the study and completed self-reported measures assessing symptoms of aging, depression, and anxiety. Symptoms of aging were assessed by the Aging Males' Symptoms scale. Anxiety and depression were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Erectile dysfunction was considered if a response to item 15 on the Aging Males' Symptoms scale (impaired sexual potency) was rated with 4 or 5 points. Affective disturbance was assessed by the total scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
RESULTS: Age was correlated with less anxiety and more sexual symptoms. Anxiety and depression were associated with more severe symptoms of aging, and depression was associated with more sexual symptoms than was anxiety. Impaired sexual potency was the only sexual symptom not significantly associated with depression and anxiety. Depression was associated with an interspousal age gap of ≥6 years. The point prevalence of erectile dysfunction was 28.4%, and age and affective disturbance were associated with the risk of erectile dysfunction.
CONCLUSION: Impaired sexual potency should raise the suspicion of androgen deficiency rather than depression and anxiety among middle-aged or older male psychiatric outpatients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  androgen deficiency; anxiety; depression; erectile dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766639      PMCID: PMC3677807          DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S45190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Interv Aging        ISSN: 1176-9092            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

The term “andropause” has been used to describe syndromes in aging males including various clinical symptoms encompassing somatic, psychological, and sexual dimensions, as well as endocrine dysfunction, partly related to an age-related decline in androgen and even androgen deficiency.1–3 It is also associated with dysthymia4 and an increase in depressive symptoms.5,6 Exogenous testosterone replacement may be beneficial for treatment-resistant depression associated with androgen deficiency.6,7 Androgen deficiency is associated with premature death, erectile dysfunction (ED), metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.2 Symptoms of andropause and androgen deficiency overlap with common psychiatric disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD).8 In one study conducted in a male climacteric clinic in Japan, patients with MDD had significantly more severe symptoms of aging as assessed by the Aging Males’ Symptoms (AMS) scale than did patients without MDD; the estimated prevalence of MDD approached 50%.9 Sato et al, in 2007, reported that the prevalence of MDD was 42% in an andrology clinic and recommended routine screening for MDD.10 Although the gold standard for the diagnosis of androgen deficiency is the measurement of serum free or bioavailable testosterone, such data are not available for every male suspected of suffering from decreased testicular function.11 In order to assess aging males’ symptoms, a valuable and easily applicable screening tool should be considered. In the present study, the AMS scale was selected as the screening questionnaire for several reasons. First, the validity and reliability of the AMS scale had been established in Taiwan.12 Second, the internal structure of the AMS scale across other countries has been sufficiently similar to conclude that the scale measures the same phenomenon in varying contexts.13 Third, the AMS scale was developed in response to the lack of a standardized scale14 such as the androgen deficiency in aging males questionnaire. Fourth, it can measure the severity of symptoms of aging over time in different dimensions as well as their impact on health-related quality of life (QoL).15 Due to the complex nature of the phenomenon and the limited number of studies in the male psychiatric population, we investigated the relationship between aging males’ symptoms and emotional distress by using the AMS scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and examined whether sexual dysfunction could be a differentiating characteristic for symptoms of aging among middle-aged or older male psychiatric outpatients.

Methods

Population

The sample was previously recruited for validation of the Chinese version of the AMS scale, and a more detailed description has been published elsewhere.12 One hundred seventy-six Taiwanese men, 40–80 years of age, attending the psychiatric outpatient service of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou (a convenience sample) participated in the study. All participants reported neurotic symptoms such as anxiety, depression, insomnia, or somatic complaints. The participants had received general psychiatric evaluations during their initial visits and had no psychotic, bipolar, or cognitive disorders and no history of psychoactive substance abuse. The demographic data were obtained through clinical interviews (Table 1). The age groups were defined as middle-aged (40–49 years), pre-elderly (50–64 years), and elderly (≥65 years). The interspousal age gap (IAG) was defined as the absolute age difference between the participants and their spouses. Three IAG groups were defined: age-matched (IAG = 0–2 years), moderate age gap (IAG = 3–5 years), and large age gap (IAG ≥ 6 years). Body mass index (BMI) groups were defined as normal (BMI < 24.0 kg/m2), overweight (BMI = 24.0–26.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI > 27.0 kg/m2). Education groups were defined by years of education: primary school and under (0–6 years), high school (7–12 years), and college or university and above (>12 years).
Table 1

Demographic data and characteristics of the initial participant sample (n = 176)

Mean ± SDFrequency (%)
Age (years)54.3 ± 10.7
 Middle-aged (40–49)74 (42.1)
 Pre-elderly (50–64)65 (36.9)
 Elderly (≥65)37 (21.0)
Married157 (89.2)
Spousal age (years)51.0 ± 10.1
 IAG (years)3.9 ± 4.1
 Age-matched (0–2)73 (46.5)
 Moderate age gap (3–5)44 (28.0)
 Large age gap (≥6)40 (25.5)
Education
 Primary school and under (≤6 years)47 (26.7)
 High school (7–12 years)84 (47.7)
 College or university and above (>12 years)45 (25.6)
Employed104 (59.1)
BMI (kg/m2)24.4 ± 2.8
 Normal (<24)77 (43.7)
 Overweight (24–26.9)70 (39.8)
 Obese (≥27)29 (16.5)
HADS
 HADS-T16.0 ± 8.1
 HADS-A8.3 ± 4.6
 HADS-D7.7 ± 4.7
AMS scale
 AMS-T39.9 ± 11.2
 AMS-PSY11.8 ± 4.5
 AMS-SOM16.4 ± 4.7
 AMS-SEX11.7 ± 4.0

Abbreviations: AMS, Aging Males’ Symptoms; AMS-PSY, psychological score; AMS-SEX, sexual score; AMS-SOM, somatovegetative score; AMS-T, total score; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS-A, anxiety score; HADS-D, depression score; HADS-T, total score; IAG, interspousal age gap; SD, standard deviation.

Main outcome measures

Aging males’ symptoms scale

This 17-item self-administered questionnaire is the best studied and validated questionnaire to help assess the severity of symptoms of aging males and the QoL in men >40 years of age.13,16 The scale has been validated internationally with a standard translation of the Chinese version.12 Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale, with a response of “5” representing “extremely severe” and “1” representing “none.” The total score (AMS-T) measures the overall severity of symptoms of aging and the QoL. The psychological score (AMS-PSY), the sum of items 6–8, 11, and 13, assesses the psychological dimension. The somatovegetative score (AMS-SOM), the sum of items 1–5, 9, and 10, assesses the somatic dimension. The sexual score (AMS-SEX), the sum of the remaining five items, assesses the sexual dimension. The AMS scale is moderately correlated with the Beck Depression Inventory9,17 and the HADS.12 With a cut-off value of 27,18 the AMS-T has a sensitivity of 29% and a specificity of 97% in predicting androgen deficiency.19 Erectile dysfunction (ED) is considered if a response to item 15 of the AMS scale (impaired sexual potency) is rated at 4 or 5.20

Hospital anxiety and depression scale

The HADS, a 14-item self-administered questionnaire comprised of a seven-item anxiety scale (HADS-A) and a seven-item depression scale (HADS-D) scored on a four-point Likert scale (0–3), is designed to provide a simple yet reliable screening tool for depression and anxiety in various clinical settings, with good internally consistent reliability for anxiety and depression (Cronbach’s α = 0.80 and 0.76, respectively),21–23 and with good sensitivity and specificity (approximately 0.8) for identifying psychiatric cases.24,25 The total score (HADS-T) measures affective disturbance; anxiety is defined as a HADS-A ≥ 11; depression is defined as a HADS-D ≥ 11.23 Four severity grades of psychological distress are distinguished as follows: none (HADS-T < 8), little (HADS-T = 8–10), moderate (HADS-T = 11–15), and severe (HADS-T ≥ 16).22 To determine the effect of anxiety and depression, control was defined as a HADS-A < 11 and a HADS-D < 11, anxiety as a HADS-A ≥ 11 and a HADS-D < 11, depression as a HADS-A < 11 and a HADS-D ≥ 11, and mixed anxiety and depression as both HADS-A ≥ 11 and HADS-D ≥ 11.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R version 2.14.1 for Windows (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).26 Student’s t-test was used to test for continuous variables by two groups. A one-way analysis of variance was used to test for differences among groups. A post hoc Tukey HSD test was used to discern subgroup differences. Fisher’s exact test was used to test for an association between two categorical variables. Kendall’s correlation coefficients were derived with significance and multiplicity adjusted by Holm’s method. A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was used for ED. The independent variables were the HADS-T, age, the IAG, BMI, marriage, employment, and education. The P value was set at 0.05 for all statistical tests.

Results

The mean age of subjects was 54.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.7). Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of all 176 participants.

Correlation between age, BMI, HADS, and AMS

Age was negatively correlated with the HADS-A (τ = −0.16), and positively correlated with the AMS-SEX (τ = 0.22). BMI was not correlated with HADS or AMS. There were mostly weak-to-moderately positive correlations (τ = 0.21–0.55) among responses to the HADS and AMS scales (Table 2).
Table 2

Kendall correlations between age, BMI, HADS, and AMS scale

AgeBMIHADS-THADS-AHADS-D
BMI0.05
HADS-T−0.06−0.05
HADS-A−0.16*−0.030.72***
HADS-D0.03−0.040.73***0.41***
AMS-T0.02−0.100.50***0.44***0.42***
AMS-PSY−0.11−0.060.55***0.54***0.40***
AMS-SOM−0.06−0.100.43***0.38***0.37***
AMS-SEX0.22**−0.100.29***0.21**0.28***

Notes:

P < 0.05;

P < 0.01;

P < 0.001.

Abbreviations: AMS, Aging Males’ Symptoms scale; AMS-PSY, psychological score; AMS-SEX, sexual score; AMS-SOM, somatovegetative score; AMS-T, total score; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS-A, anxiety score; HADS-D, depression score; HADS-T, total score.

Groups of depression and anxiety

Table 3 shows the results of the one-way analysis of variance among groups in terms of depression and anxiety. There were 103 (58.5%) controls, 18 (10.2%) subjects with depression, 26 (14.8%) with anxiety, and 29 (16.5%) with mixed anxiety and depression. There were significant differences in the IAG, AMS-SEX, and all sexual symptoms except impaired sexual potency among groups with depression and anxiety. A post hoc Tukey HSD test showed that the depression group had a significantly higher IAG than the control and anxiety groups. The group with anxiety only had a significantly higher score on item 12 (past peak) than did the control group, while the groups with depression and mixed anxiety and depression had significantly higher scores on items 12, 16 (fewer morning erections), and 17 (disturbed libido) than did the control group. The group with depression had a significantly higher score on item 14 (decrease in beard growth) than did the other 3 groups.
Table 3

Analysis of variance among groups with depression and anxiety

Control (1) (n = 103)
Depression (2) (n = 18)
Anxiety (3) (n = 26)
Mixed anxiety and depression (4) (n = 29)
P valueTukey HSD
HADS-A < 11HADS-D < 11
HADS-A < 11HADS-D ≥ 11
HADS-A ≥ 11HADS-D < 11
HADS-A ≥ 11HADS-D ≥ 11
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD
Age (years)54.910.857.812.651.610.152.39.20.1765
IAG (years)3.73.87.05.73.54.43.74.10.02712 >1 and 3
AMS-SEX10.43.414.34.412.23.914.04.0<0.00012 and 4 >1
Item 12Past peak1.90.93.11.22.81.03.31.1<0.00012 and 3 and 4 >1
Item 14Decreased beard growth1.20.41.71.01.30.61.20.50.00162 >1 and 3 and 4
Item 15Impaired sexual potency2.61.23.21.22.91.23.11.20.0676
Item 16Fewer morning erections2.51.13.31.12.81.03.31.20.00162 and 4 >1
Item 17Disturbed libido2.31.13.11.22.51.13.11.30.00052 and 4 >1

Abbreviations: AMS-SEX, sexual score; HADS-A, anxiety score; HADS-D, depression score; IAG, interspousal age gap; SD, standard deviation.

Erectile dysfunction

Fifty (28.4%) of the 176 participants had ED. There was significant positive association between age and ED (for every SD [10.7 years], the odds ratio for ED was 2.51 [95% confidence interval 1.58–4.00]). Subjects with ED were significantly older (61.0 ± 11.0 years versus 51.7 ± 9.4 years, t[174] = 5.635, P < 0.0001); had higher spousal ages (57.0 ± 9.9 years versus 48.4 ± 9.2 years, t[155] = 5.226, P < 0.0001); were less employed (40% versus 66.7%, P = 0.0020); and scored higher on the AMS-T (47.7 ± 11.1 versus 36.8 ± 9.7, t[174] = 6.419, P < 0.0001), AMS-PSY (13.4 ± 4.8 versus 11.2 ± 4.3, t[174] = 2.958, P = 0.0036), AMS-SOM (18.3 ± 5.0 versus 15.7 ± 4.5, t[174] = 3.333, P = 0.0011), and AMS-SEX (16.0 ± 2.8 versus 9.9 ± 3.0, t[174] = 12.523, P < 0.0001) compared with the 126 participants without ED. Subjects with ED had a trend towards a higher HADS-D than those without ED (8.8 ± 5.4 versus 7.3 ± 4.4, t[174] = 1.922, P = 0.0563). Subjects with ED were not significantly different from those without ED in terms of IAG, HADS scores, marital status, BMI, and education (Table 4). After adjusting for demographic factors including age, BMI, HADS-D, and employment, the results of multiple logistic regression analyses for ED are shown in Table 5.
Table 4

Comparisons between subjects with and without erectile dysfunction

No ED (n = 126)ED (n = 50)P value
Age51.7 ± 9.461.0 ± 11.0<0.0001
Spousal age48.4 ± 9.257.0 ± 9.9<0.0001
IAG3.9 ± 4.24.2 ± 4.40.6944
BMI24.6 ± 2.623.9 ± 4.20.1606
HADS-T15.4 ± 7.917.5 ± 8.40.1353
HADS-A8.1 ± 4.38.6 ± 5.10.5030
HADS-D7.3 ± 4.48.8 ± 5.40.0563
AMS-T36.8 ± 9.747.7 ± 11.1<0.0001
AMS-PSY11.2 ± 4.313.4 ± 4.80.0036
AMS-SOM15.7 ± 4.518.3 ± 5.00.0011
AMS-SEX9.9 ± 3.016.0 ± 2.8<0.0001
Married110 (87.3%)47 (94%)0.2828
Employed84 (66.7%)20 (40%)0.0020
Education0.3253
 ≤6 years30 (23.8%)17 (34%)
 7–12 years61 (48.4%)23 (46%)
 >12 years35 (27.8%)10 (20%)
Anxiety29 (23.0%)18 (36%)0.0908
Depression36 (28.6%)19 (38%)0.2793
Mixed anxiety and depression19 (15.1%)10 (20%)0.4997
Distress56 (44.4%)28 (56%)0.1836

Abbreviations: AMS-PSY, psychological score; AMS-SEX, sexual score; AMS-SOM, somatovegetative score; AMS-T, total score; BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); HADS-A, anxiety score; HADS-D, depression score; HADS-T, total score; IAG, interspousal age gap; SD, standard deviation; ED, erectile dysfunction.

Table 5

Logistic regression of erectile dysfunction

β*SEOR95% CIP (Wald’s test)
Intercept−1.050.330.0016
Age (years)0.920.242.511.58–4.000.0001
BMI (kg/m2)−0.290.190.750.51–1.090.1278
HADS-D0.320.191.380.96–1.980.0858
Employed−1.020.450900.37–2.200.8223

Note: β*, standardized beta.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HADS-D, depression score; OR, odds ratio; SE, standard error.

Discussion

In the present study, anxiety and depression were associated with more severe symptoms of aging and a poorer QoL, yet they exerted different effects on sexual symptoms. It is noteworthy that impaired sexual potency was the only sexual symptom not significantly associated with anxiety and depression. Anxiety was associated only with past peak, while depression was associated with all sexual symptoms except impaired sexual potency. The severity of both anxiety and depression was moderately correlated with past peak, while age was not, suggesting that this symptom was related more to psychological health than to aging. The other four sexual symptoms were weakly correlated with severity of depression but not with anxiety, suggesting that depression may play a more important role in sexual dysfunction than does anxiety. There was a weak negative correlation between age and severity of anxiety, and no correlation between age and severity of depression, which is in contrast to a previous report of a weak negative correlation between age and anxiety, and a curvilinear relationship between age and depression.27 Age was positively correlated with the severity of sexual symptoms, impaired sexual potency, and fewer morning erections, but was not correlated with past peak and disturbed libido, paralleling the findings associated with age-related sexual dysfunction. A large interspousal age gap was associated with depression and its severity, but not with anxiety. Such an age gap may place more of a psychological burden on men based on differences in sexual function, age identity,28 health status, and social life. In one study of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, IAG was associated with increased symptoms and burden on the partner.29 Erectile dysfunction has a multifaceted relationship with psychological, neurologic, hormonal, and vascular problems,2 and is linked to metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases.30 The prevalence of ED in Asian countries is estimated to be 7%–15% (40–49 years of age) and 39%–49% (60–70 years of age).31 Several studies have shown a high prevalence of ED among psychiatric patients.32,33 Age is one of the important risk factors for ED. Other risk factors include less than good overall health, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, genitourinary disease, psychiatric disorders, other chronic conditions, smoking, and hormonal factors.30 Schneider et al reported that significantly more individuals in clinical samples had ED than did a general population sample (28.9%–30.8% versus 15%), and subjects with ED were older, had lower testosterone levels, and more anxiety than those without ED.20 The point prevalence of ED in our sample was 28.4%, and subjects with ED were significantly older, more likely to be unemployed, and had significantly higher AMS scores than did those without ED. The response to the HADS was not significantly different between subjects with and without ED. As shown in our logistic regression model, there was only a trend towards an association between ED and depression but not for anxiety. The present cross-sectional study is one of the few papers to investigate relationships between symptoms of aging and emotional distress among male psychiatric outpatients with neurotic complaints, but it does have several methodological limitations. First, we did not have detailed medical and lifestyle assessments of the participants, and not all participants underwent blood tests for testosterone levels due to some economic and technical constraints. Second, we did not record potential confounding factors such as income, marriage duration, partner relationship, and psychosocial stressors, all of which may contribute to depression and anxiety. Third, self-administered questionnaires do not necessarily infer any specific diagnosis, and they are confounded by the current state of mind and personality traits. Nevertheless, they are efficient tools and provide some insight in phenomenological investigation. In addition, the AMS scale was not specific for the diagnosis of androgen deficiency, and we did not use a validated assessment of ED. Furthermore, the results may not be applied to the community at large due to the small sample size and hospital-based population.

Conclusion

Anxiety, depression, and ED were associated with more severe symptoms of aging and a poorer QoL in males. Impaired sexual potency was related more to aging than to emotional problems. A high prevalence of ED highlighted the importance of routine screening in male psychiatric outpatients who present with symptoms of aging. Mental health clinicians should be aware of the relationship between symptoms of aging and psychological health, and request further investigation when warranted.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Androgen deficiency in aging and metabolically challenged men.

Authors:  Jeremy B Shelton; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 2.  Normative hypogonadism and depression: Does 'andropause' exist?

Authors:  S N Seidman
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Can results of the Aging Males' Symptoms (AMS) scale predict those of screening scales for androgen deficiency?

Authors:  L A J Heinemann; F Saad; K Heinemann; D M Thai
Journal:  Aging Male       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.892

4.  Definitions/epidemiology/risk factors for sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Ronald W Lewis; Kerstin S Fugl-Meyer; Giovanni Corona; Richard D Hayes; Edward O Laumann; Edson D Moreira; Alessandra H Rellini; Taylor Segraves
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Complaint of insomnia as a predictor of aging symptoms in males at a men's health clinic.

Authors:  Yu-Wen Chiu; Chun-Lin Chu; Yu Chen; Jun-Ran Jiang; Yeuk-Lun Chau; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Ming-Li Hsieh; Chun-Liang Chen; Ching-Yen Chen
Journal:  Aging Male       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.892

6.  Validation of a screening questionnaire for androgen deficiency in aging males.

Authors:  J E Morley; E Charlton; P Patrick; F E Kaiser; P Cadeau; D McCready; H M Perry
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.694

Review 7.  Androgen deficiency in the aging male: when, who, and how to investigate and treat.

Authors:  Alvaro Morales; J Lisa Tenover
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 8.  Androgens and the aging male.

Authors:  Stuart N Seidman
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2007

9.  Symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia: impact on partners' quality of life.

Authors:  Dionisios Mitropoulos; Ioannis Anastasiou; Constantina Giannopoulou; Panagiotis Nikolopoulos; Christos Alamanis; Anastasios Zervas; Constantine Dimopoulos
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale.

Authors:  R Philip Snaith
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  8 in total

1.  Androgen deficiency and dry eye syndrome in the aging male.

Authors:  Patrick M Azcarate; Vincent D Venincasa; William Feuer; Frank Stanczyk; Andrew V Schally; Anat Galor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Sexual Function Across Aging.

Authors:  Anita H Clayton; Veronica Harsh
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Inflaming sex differences in mood disorders.

Authors:  Jennifer R Rainville; Georgia E Hodes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Validity and reliability of male andropause symptoms self-assessment questionnaire among elderly males in Khuzestan province of Iran.

Authors:  Abdolrahim Asadollahi; Laleh Fani Saberi; Nasrin Faraji
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2013-10

5.  Validity and clinical utilization of the Chinese version of the Gotland Male Depression Scale at a men's health polyclinic.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Chu; Yu Chen; Kun-Hao Jiang; Jiun-Liang Chen; Chin-Pang Lee; Yeuk-Lun Chau; Ching-Yen Chen
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Psychological burden prediction based on demographic variables among infertile men with sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Hai-Ming Cao; Zi Wan; Yong Gao; Jun-Long Zhang; Yan Zhang; Hai-Peng Xiao; Xiang-An Tu; Xiang-Zhou Sun; Chun-Hua Deng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Andropause - state of the art 2015 and review of selected aspects.

Authors:  Grzegorz Jakiel; Marta Makara-Studzińska; Michał Ciebiera; Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2015-03-25

Review 8.  Erectile dysfunction in the elderly: an old widespread issue with novel treatment perspectives.

Authors:  Pietro Gareri; Alberto Castagna; Davide Francomano; Gregorio Cerminara; Pasquale De Fazio
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.257

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.