Literature DB >> 23766396

Comparing two motor assessment tools to evaluate neurobehavioral intervention effects in infants with very low birth weight at 1 year.

Janeline W P Van Hus1, Martine Jeukens-Visser, Karen Koldewijn, Loekie Van Sonderen, Joke H Kok, Frans Nollet, Aleid G Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) are at increased risk for motor deficits, which may be reduced by early intervention programs. For detection of motor deficits and to monitor intervention, different assessment tools are available. It is important to choose tools that are sensitive to evaluate the efficacy of intervention on motor outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and the Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Dutch Second Edition (BSID-II-NL) in their ability to evaluate effects of an early intervention, provided by pediatric physical therapists, on motor development in infants with VLBW at 12 months corrected age (CA).
DESIGN: This was a secondary study in which data collected from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) were used.
METHODS: At 12 months CA, 116 of 176 infants with VLBW participating in an RCT on the effect of the Infant Behavioral Assessment and Intervention Program were assessed with both the AIMS and the PDI. Intervention effects on the AIMS and PDI were compared.
RESULTS: Corrected for baseline differences, significant intervention effects were found for AIMS and PDI scores. The highest effect size was for the AIMS subscale sit. A significant reduction of abnormal motor development in the intervention group was found only with the AIMS. LIMITATIONS: No Dutch norms are available for the AIMS.
CONCLUSIONS: The responsiveness of the AIMS to detect intervention effects was better than that of the PDI. Therefore, caution is recommended in monitoring infants with VLBW only with the PDI, and the use of both the AIMS and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development is advised when evaluating intervention effects on motor development at 12 months CA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23766396     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  3 in total

1.  PPREMO: a prospective cohort study of preterm infant brain structure and function to predict neurodevelopmental outcome.

Authors:  Joanne M George; Roslyn N Boyd; Paul B Colditz; Stephen E Rose; Kerstin Pannek; Jurgen Fripp; Barbara E Lingwood; Melissa M Lai; Annice H T Kong; Robert S Ware; Alan Coulthard; Christine M Finn; Sasaka E Bandaranayake
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.125

2.  Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Haifeng Li; Jiangping Wang; Huiying Jin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Nutrient Enrichment of Human Milk with Human and Bovine Milk-Based Fortifiers for Infants Born <1250 g: 18-Month Neurodevelopment Follow-Up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hopperton; Deborah L O'Connor; Nicole Bando; Aisling M Conway; Dawn V Y Ng; Alex Kiss; Jacqueline Jackson; Linh Ly; Sharon L Unger
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-11-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.